Comparison of residual geometric errors obtained for lung SBRT under static beams and VMAT techniques: Implications for PTV margins

•VMAT reduces time spent on bed for Lung SBRT patients compared to static beams.•The average residual positional errors are less for patients treated with VMAT.•Introducing VMAT for lung SBRT could reduce setup margins from 5 mm to 3 mm.•However, we recommend maintaining a 5 mm margin to further red...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physica medica 2018-08, Vol.52, p.129-132
Hauptverfasser: Vloet, Anita, Li, Winnie, Giuliani, Meredith, Seco, Petula, Silver, Lauren, Sun, Alexander, Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•VMAT reduces time spent on bed for Lung SBRT patients compared to static beams.•The average residual positional errors are less for patients treated with VMAT.•Introducing VMAT for lung SBRT could reduce setup margins from 5 mm to 3 mm.•However, we recommend maintaining a 5 mm margin to further reduce time on bed.
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.07.009