Aortic flow after valve sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses reconstruction

This study applied advanced 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging processing to assess differences in aortic flow dynamics after valve sparing root replacement, with and without reconstruction of the Valsalva sinuses. We enrolled patients after valve sparing root replacement with a straight tubular prosthesis (n = 10) or with a prosthesis with Valsalva neosinuses (n = 10); age-matched subjects without cardiovascular diseases served as controls (n = 10). 4-Dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions were performed on a 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging unit. In-house processing was used to segment the aortic lumen and extract the volumetric 4-dimensional flow velocity field. Velocity flow streamlines were computed to compare the amount of rotational flow and wall shear stress. Occurrence of abnormal wall shear stress (WSS) was estimated within the descending aorta of each surgical group. Physiologic-like sinus vortices were visible in the aortic root when using the prosthesis with neosinuses, whereas straight tubular graft revealed localized intrados malrotations (P = .003 for organized vortical structures vs neosinuses graft and P