Safeguarding Against Conflicts of Interest in the Surgical Literature
Sacks and Hines talk about safeguarding against conflicts of interest in the surgical literature. In some circumstances, remuneration from a company may support a researcher's time used to perform a study, but unfortunately, a substantial body of literature consistently documents bias attribute...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2018-11, Vol.153 (11), p.1002-1003 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Sacks and Hines talk about safeguarding against conflicts of interest in the surgical literature. In some circumstances, remuneration from a company may support a researcher's time used to perform a study, but unfortunately, a substantial body of literature consistently documents bias attributed to these financial payments, which are ubiquitous in medicine. In 2015, payments from industry to physicians and teaching hospitals reported under the Physician Payment Sunshine Act amounted to $7.5 billion. In response, the research community has established safeguards against the potential influence of these relationships. A cornerstone of these safeguards is the requirement that researchers disclose any financial ties that may pose a conflict of interest (COI), thereby informing a reader’s interpretation of a study's findings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2168-6254 2168-6262 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2587 |