Safeguarding Against Conflicts of Interest in the Surgical Literature

Sacks and Hines talk about safeguarding against conflicts of interest in the surgical literature. In some circumstances, remuneration from a company may support a researcher's time used to perform a study, but unfortunately, a substantial body of literature consistently documents bias attribute...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2018-11, Vol.153 (11), p.1002-1003
Hauptverfasser: Sacks, Greg D, Hines, O. Joe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sacks and Hines talk about safeguarding against conflicts of interest in the surgical literature. In some circumstances, remuneration from a company may support a researcher's time used to perform a study, but unfortunately, a substantial body of literature consistently documents bias attributed to these financial payments, which are ubiquitous in medicine. In 2015, payments from industry to physicians and teaching hospitals reported under the Physician Payment Sunshine Act amounted to $7.5 billion. In response, the research community has established safeguards against the potential influence of these relationships. A cornerstone of these safeguards is the requirement that researchers disclose any financial ties that may pose a conflict of interest (COI), thereby informing a reader’s interpretation of a study's findings.
ISSN:2168-6254
2168-6262
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2587