Does normal substantia nigra echogenicity make a difference in Parkinson’s disease diagnosis? A real clinical practice follow-up study
Objectives Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity (SN+) detected by transcranial ultrasound (TUS) is useful for Parkinson’s disease (PD) diagnosis. Approximately 15% false negative results of unknown significance are reported. However, most TUS studies are transversal, and diagnosis of PD may change dur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurology 2018-10, Vol.265 (10), p.2363-2369 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity (SN+) detected by transcranial ultrasound (TUS) is useful for Parkinson’s disease (PD) diagnosis. Approximately 15% false negative results of unknown significance are reported. However, most TUS studies are transversal, and diagnosis of PD may change during follow-up.
Methods
Analysis of our prospective registry of TUS in clinical practice, selecting patients with sufficient bone window, to whom TUS was performed because of suspected PD, and a minimum of 3-year follow-up. Subjects were classified regarding SN echogenicity (SN+/SN−).
Results
172 patients (122 SN+, 50 SN−), mean age 71 years (25–90), were included. At the end of follow-up, PD diagnosis was retained by 91% SN+ vs. 54% SN− subjects (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0340-5354 1432-1459 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00415-018-9006-5 |