Use of antimicrobial agent pocket irrigation for cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection prophylaxis: Results from an international survey
Purpose Survey the usage and application protocol of antimicrobial agent pocket irrigation for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection prophylaxis. Background Local antibiotic usage for CIED infection prophylaxis, in particular pocket irrigation, is a well‐known strategy but wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2018-10, Vol.41 (10), p.1298-1306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Survey the usage and application protocol of antimicrobial agent pocket irrigation for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection prophylaxis.
Background
Local antibiotic usage for CIED infection prophylaxis, in particular pocket irrigation, is a well‐known strategy but with little data on its clinical effectiveness.
Methods
An anonymous voluntary online survey was sent to a total of 2,092 arrhythmia‐oriented cardiologists in 51 countries (1,490 from the United States).
Results
There were 487 responses (response rate 23.3%: U.S. 28.2%, outside of the U.S. 11.1%). Eighty‐seven percent of respondents use intraoperative antimicrobial agent pocket irrigation and/or an antimicrobial eluting pouch to reduce CIED infection. Fifty‐four percent of respondents believe that it is effective to use an antimicrobial agent pocket irrigation to reduce CIED infection; 33% of respondents are uncertain; a few consider this strategy ineffective (13%) or offered no opinion. Significant differences exist in the practice patterns and beliefs between the U.S. and non‐U.S. countries (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pace.13473 |