Personality Process-Structure Duality: Reply to Two Commentaries
In two commentaries, Kostromina and Grishina ( 2018 ) and Mironenko ( 2018 ) offered constructive thoughts and questions in response to an article by Giordano (2018, Culture & Psychology, 23, 502–518) on the merits of an approach to understanding individual personality that focuses on the proces...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Integrative physiological and behavioral science 2018-12, Vol.52 (4), p.686-693 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In two commentaries, Kostromina and Grishina (
2018
) and Mironenko (
2018
) offered constructive thoughts and questions in response to an article by Giordano (2018, Culture & Psychology, 23, 502–518) on the merits of an approach to understanding individual personality that focuses on the processes rather than structures of personality. In this reply, the authors seek to clarify some of the points made in the original article. The authors also describe a personality process-structure duality, whereby personality is conceptualized in terms of processes or structures based on the methods used to study it. If the goal is to understand the dynamic and emergent properties of
individual
personality, the authors continue to argue for the merits of a process-centric approach and the avoidance of structural thinking. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-4502 1936-3567 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12124-018-9455-5 |