Effect of vildagliptin versus glibenclamide on endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension: a randomized controlled trial

Aims Several trials have reported that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2DM), improve endothelial function. The current study investigated the effects of vildagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, compared to glibenclamide on endothelial function, arterial stiffness,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta diabetologica 2018-12, Vol.55 (12), p.1237-1245
Hauptverfasser: Cosenso-Martin, Luciana Neves, Giollo-Júnior, Luiz Tadeu, Fernandes, Letícia Aparecida Barufi, Cesarino, Cláudia Bernardi, Nakazone, Marcelo Arruda, Machado, Maurício de Nassau, Yugar-Toledo, Juan Carlos, Vilela-Martin, José Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims Several trials have reported that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2DM), improve endothelial function. The current study investigated the effects of vildagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, compared to glibenclamide on endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and blood pressure in patients with T2DM and hypertension. Methods Patients aged over 35 years with T2DM and hypertension, but without cardiovascular disease, were randomly allocated to treatment with vildagliptin ( n  = 25) or glibenclamide ( n  = 25). Both groups took metformin. Endothelial function was evaluated by peripheral artery tonometry (Endo-PAT 2000) to calculate the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and arterial stiffness. Primary outcome was change in the RHI after 12 weeks of treatment. Twenty-four-hour non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed using a Mobil-O-Graph ® 24-h PWA monitor. Arterial stiffness was assessed using the augmentation index corrected for 75 bpm (AIx75), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP). Results There were no changes in the RHI in the vildagliptin group (before 2.35 ± 0.59; after 2.24 ± 0.60; p value = NS) or in the glibenclamide group (before 2.36 ± 0.52; after 2.34 ± 0.50; p value = NS), with no differences between groups ( p value = NS). There was also no difference between vildagliptin and glibenclamide treatment in respect to AIx75 ( p value = NS), cSBP ( p value = NS) or PWV ( p value = NS). Conclusions Vildagliptin and glibenclamide similarly do not change the endothelial function and arterial stiffness after 12 weeks of treatment in diabetic and hypertensive patients without cardiovascular disease. Thus, vildagliptin has a neutral effect on vascular function. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02145611, registered on 11 Jun 2013.
ISSN:0940-5429
1432-5233
DOI:10.1007/s00592-018-1204-1