Enhancing and Advancing Shared Governance Through a Targeted Decision-Making Redesign

OBJECTIVEThe study aim was to determine if a targeted redesign of shared decision making improved shared governance (SG). BACKGROUNDNursing SG is collaborative decision making between nurses at every level; it improves quality of care, empowers nurses, and enhances nurse satisfaction. METHODSUsing a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nursing administration 2018-09, Vol.48 (9), p.445-451
Hauptverfasser: Dechairo-Marino, Ann E, Collins Raggi, Mara E, Mendelson, Sherri Garber, Highfield, Martha E.F, Hess, Robert G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVEThe study aim was to determine if a targeted redesign of shared decision making improved shared governance (SG). BACKGROUNDNursing SG is collaborative decision making between nurses at every level; it improves quality of care, empowers nurses, and enhances nurse satisfaction. METHODSUsing a quasi-experimental, pretest/posttest design, researchers electronically distributed the Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG) to an inclusive, convenience sample of RNs in a Magnet®-designated 377-bed community medical center. Preintervention scores were used to tailor a redesign of shared decision making, and postintervention data were collected within 1 year to measure outcomes. RESULTSIPNG overall score and 5 of 6 subscale scores significantly increased after the redesign. CONCLUSIONSChanges to an SG structure can take 2 to 5 years to be realized. Our findings corroborate that the IPNG is a valuable tool in promoting setting-specific SG.
ISSN:0002-0443
1539-0721
DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000647