Association of a Health Care Provider Review Meeting With Cesarean Delivery Rates: A Quality Improvement Program

OBJECTIVE:To examine the association of a quality improvement effort that was mediated through weekly review of all criteria for cesarean delivery on cesarean delivery prevalence and indications. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a natural experiment model that compared two tim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2018-09, Vol.132 (3), p.637-642
Hauptverfasser: Skeith, Ashley E., Valent, Amy M., Marshall, Nicole E., Pereira, Leonardo M., Caughey, Aaron B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:To examine the association of a quality improvement effort that was mediated through weekly review of all criteria for cesarean delivery on cesarean delivery prevalence and indications. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a natural experiment model that compared two timeframes, from 2009 to 2013, at a single institution. We introduced a weekly retrospective review conference to discuss all cesarean deliveries in 2010 that continued over time. The conferences were attended by obstetric care providers, anesthesiology, and labor and delivery nurses. Date of delivery was dichotomized by those delivering before July 1, 2010, and those delivering after. We included women with term singleton vertex gestations in our study population and then examined the rates of cesarean delivery by date of delivery. We then examined indications for the cesarean deliveries during the study period based on surgeon documentation. χ tests were used for statistical comparisons and a P value of
ISSN:0029-7844
1873-233X
DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002793