Quantitative interpretation of optical density measurements using PF4‐dependent enzyme‐immunoassays

Background: Many laboratories test for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) using a PF4‐dependent enzyme‐immunoassay (EIA). An advantage of the EIA is its simplicity; a disadvantage is that it only indirectly detects heparin‐dependent, platelet‐activating antibodies (‘HIT antibodies’). Objectives:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2008-08, Vol.6 (8), p.1304-1312
Hauptverfasser: WARKENTIN, T. E., SHEPPARD, J. I., MOORE, J. C., SIGOUIN, C. S., KELTON, J. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Many laboratories test for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) using a PF4‐dependent enzyme‐immunoassay (EIA). An advantage of the EIA is its simplicity; a disadvantage is that it only indirectly detects heparin‐dependent, platelet‐activating antibodies (‘HIT antibodies’). Objectives: To determine whether the magnitude of a positive EIA result, expressed in optical density (OD) units, predicts risk of HIT antibodies, defined as a strong‐positive platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA) result (≥50% serotonin release). Patients/methods: We determined the risk of a strong‐positive SRA result for five categories of OD reactivity (
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03025.x