Evaluation of a simple means to reduce discard in the Kattegat-Skagerrak Nephrops ( Nephrops norvegicus) fishery: Commercial testing of different codends and square-mesh panels
Discarding of fish species in the Kattegat-Skagerrak Nephrops directed fisheries remains at high levels. In this work we have tested four sets of codends pair-wise with the catch comparison technique under full commercial conditions to assess their potential in reducing the catch of undersized comme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fisheries research 2008-06, Vol.91 (2), p.175-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Discarding of fish species in the Kattegat-Skagerrak
Nephrops directed fisheries remains at high levels. In this work we have tested four sets of codends pair-wise with the catch comparison technique under full commercial conditions to assess their potential in reducing the catch of undersized commercial species, in particular cod. We investigate the position of a 90
mm square-mesh panel (SMP), the effect of increasing the mesh size from 90 to 120
mm in the SMP, the effect of inserting a 90
mm SMP in an 80
mm codend and the effect of increasing the codend mesh size from 90 to 120
mm in a total of 89 hauls. Inserting the SMP 3–6
m from the codline compared to 6–9
m from the codline, reduced catches of cod above the minimum landing size (MLS) and
Nephrops above and below the MLS. Increasing the mesh size in the SMP from 90 to 120
mm increased the catch of cod above the MLS in weight with an overall increase of 12% in the revenue. The effect of installing a 90
mm SMP 6–9 m from the codline in a nominal 80
mm codend had no effect on the catch of cod. Increasing the nominal codend mesh size from 90 to 120
mm reduced the catch of all species below the MLS, except monkfish. Catches of
Nephrops above the MLS were, however, reduced by approximately one third and the total loss in revenue was 21%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-7836 1872-6763 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.11.022 |