Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposits in Stage III Colon Cancer
Background The American Joint Committee on Cancer includes extranodal tumor deposits in the tumor–node–metastasis classification of colon cancer. However, it is unclear how tumor deposits compare with lymph node metastases in prognostic significance. This study evaluated the survival impact of tumor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2018-10, Vol.25 (11), p.3179-3184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The American Joint Committee on Cancer includes extranodal tumor deposits in the tumor–node–metastasis classification of colon cancer. However, it is unclear how tumor deposits compare with lymph node metastases in prognostic significance. This study evaluated the survival impact of tumor deposits relative to lymph node metastases in stage III colon cancer.
Methods
The US National Cancer Database (2010–2012) was reviewed for resectable stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon, and stratified by presence of tumor deposits and lymph node metastases. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.
Results
Of 6424, 10.1% had both tumor deposits and lymph node metastases [5-year survival (5YS) 40.2%], 2.5% had tumor deposits alone (5YS 68.1%), and 87.4% had lymph node metastases alone (5YS 55.4%). Patients with lymph node metastases alone tended to have a greater number of lymph nodes retrieved (20.9 versus 18.8,
p
= 0.0126) and were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy (66.9 vs 58.0%,
p
= 0.003) than those with only tumor deposits. Patients with both had significantly worse survival at all T stages (
p
0.8, all). After controlling for patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, patients with tumor deposits alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56,
p
= 0.001] or only lymph node metastases (HR 0.64,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-018-6661-9 |