Outcomes of long-term responders to anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 when being rechallenged with the same anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 at progression

Long-term responders have been observed with anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD(L)1). Optimal duration of therapy in responding and stable disease (SD) patients is unclear with various attitudes encompassing treatment until progression disease, stopping therapy after...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2018-09, Vol.101, p.160-164
Hauptverfasser: Bernard-Tessier, A., Baldini, C., Martin, Patricia, Champiat, Stéphane, Hollebecque, Antoine, Postel-Vinay, Sophie, Varga, Andrea, Bahleda, Rastilav, Gazzah, Anas, Michot, Jean-Marie, Ribrag, Vincent, Armand, Jean-Pierre, Marabelle, Aurélien, Soria, Jean-Charles, Massard, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue
container_start_page 160
container_title European journal of cancer (1990)
container_volume 101
creator Bernard-Tessier, A.
Baldini, C.
Martin, Patricia
Champiat, Stéphane
Hollebecque, Antoine
Postel-Vinay, Sophie
Varga, Andrea
Bahleda, Rastilav
Gazzah, Anas
Michot, Jean-Marie
Ribrag, Vincent
Armand, Jean-Pierre
Marabelle, Aurélien
Soria, Jean-Charles
Massard, C.
description Long-term responders have been observed with anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD(L)1). Optimal duration of therapy in responding and stable disease (SD) patients is unclear with various attitudes encompassing treatment until progression disease, stopping therapy after a defined timeframe. We report the experience of 13 patients who discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitor in phase I trials as per protocol while experiencing a tumour-controlled disease. According to protocols, patients could restart the same immunotherapy if radiological or clinical progression occurred. Patients were treated for colorectal microsatellite instability–high genotype (n = 5), urothelial carcinoma (n = 3), melanoma (n = 2), non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 2) and triple-negative breast cancer (n = 1) for a median time of 12 months (range 10.6–12). Patients achieved 1 (8%) complete response, 10 (77%) partial response (PR) and 2 (15%) SD. The median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) defined as the time from the first infusion until progression was 24.4 months (range 15.8–49). The median time free-treatment after discontinuation was 12.6 months (range 4–39.7). Eight patients experienced disease progression and were retreated. Best responses observed after rechallenging were 2 PR (25%) and 6 SD (75%). Median PFS2 defined from the first day of retreatment until disease progression or the last news was 12.9 months (range 5–35.4). No grade 3/4 events occurred during the study period. Our data suggest that anti–PD(L)1 therapy should be resumed if progression occurs after a planned anti–PD(L)1 interruption. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. •Managing disease progression after a planned interruption of immunotherapy among long-term responders remains unclear.•Eight patients were rechallenged with the same immunotherapy for disease progression.•Rechallenge is associated with a shorter progression-free survival.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2083726812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804918308979</els_id><sourcerecordid>2117510470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e8825dd11eeb6865b110baf21f2866865221f0a675592060298fa7a7b2728eee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlkcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCC3BAlrhwSRh7E9uRuKAKKFKlXsrZcpJJ1lFiL7ZD1ZfsM-GwhQMSXDh5NP83_1jzE_KKQcmAiXdTiVNnSg5MlSBKgPoJ2TElmwJUzZ-SHTR1UyiomnPyPMYJAKSq4Bk53-eKVVW1Iw83a-r8gpH6gc7ejUXCsNCA8ehdjyHS5KlxyRbH4MdglgV72qNJB8pyv_-LNttxExm9O6CjLVo3Zs_uYOYZ3ZixO5updEAazYL_s8Ak-lPEGK13L8jZYOaILx_fC_L108fby6vi-ubzl8sP10W3V1UqUCle9z1jiK1Qom4Zg9YMnA1cia3BcwlGyLpuOAjgjRqMNLLlkitE3F-QtyffvPvbijHpxcYO59k49GvUHNRecqEYz-ibP9DJr8Hl32nOmKwZVBIyxU9UF3yMAQd9DHYx4V4z0FvaetJb2npLW4PQOe089PrRem3zaX6P_Io3A-9PAOZbfLcYdOwsug57m9NIuvf2X_4_AIICvUE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117510470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of long-term responders to anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 when being rechallenged with the same anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 at progression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bernard-Tessier, A. ; Baldini, C. ; Martin, Patricia ; Champiat, Stéphane ; Hollebecque, Antoine ; Postel-Vinay, Sophie ; Varga, Andrea ; Bahleda, Rastilav ; Gazzah, Anas ; Michot, Jean-Marie ; Ribrag, Vincent ; Armand, Jean-Pierre ; Marabelle, Aurélien ; Soria, Jean-Charles ; Massard, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernard-Tessier, A. ; Baldini, C. ; Martin, Patricia ; Champiat, Stéphane ; Hollebecque, Antoine ; Postel-Vinay, Sophie ; Varga, Andrea ; Bahleda, Rastilav ; Gazzah, Anas ; Michot, Jean-Marie ; Ribrag, Vincent ; Armand, Jean-Pierre ; Marabelle, Aurélien ; Soria, Jean-Charles ; Massard, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Long-term responders have been observed with anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD(L)1). Optimal duration of therapy in responding and stable disease (SD) patients is unclear with various attitudes encompassing treatment until progression disease, stopping therapy after a defined timeframe. We report the experience of 13 patients who discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitor in phase I trials as per protocol while experiencing a tumour-controlled disease. According to protocols, patients could restart the same immunotherapy if radiological or clinical progression occurred. Patients were treated for colorectal microsatellite instability–high genotype (n = 5), urothelial carcinoma (n = 3), melanoma (n = 2), non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 2) and triple-negative breast cancer (n = 1) for a median time of 12 months (range 10.6–12). Patients achieved 1 (8%) complete response, 10 (77%) partial response (PR) and 2 (15%) SD. The median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) defined as the time from the first infusion until progression was 24.4 months (range 15.8–49). The median time free-treatment after discontinuation was 12.6 months (range 4–39.7). Eight patients experienced disease progression and were retreated. Best responses observed after rechallenging were 2 PR (25%) and 6 SD (75%). Median PFS2 defined from the first day of retreatment until disease progression or the last news was 12.9 months (range 5–35.4). No grade 3/4 events occurred during the study period. Our data suggest that anti–PD(L)1 therapy should be resumed if progression occurs after a planned anti–PD(L)1 interruption. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. •Managing disease progression after a planned interruption of immunotherapy among long-term responders remains unclear.•Eight patients were rechallenged with the same immunotherapy for disease progression.•Rechallenge is associated with a shorter progression-free survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30071444</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use ; Apoptosis ; B7-H1 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; B7-H1 Antigen - immunology ; Bladder cancer ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Clinical trials ; Death ; Disease control ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Genotypes ; Humans ; Immune checkpoint inhibitors ; Immunotherapy ; Immunotherapy - methods ; Ligands ; Long-term follow-up ; Lung cancer ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Melanoma ; Microsatellite instability ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoplasms - classification ; Neoplasms - immunology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Oncology ; Patients ; PD-1 protein ; Programmed cell death 1 ligand ; Programmed cell death 1 receptor ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - immunology ; Reinduction ; Retreatment ; Stability ; Therapy ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Urothelial carcinoma</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2018-09, Vol.101, p.160-164</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e8825dd11eeb6865b110baf21f2866865221f0a675592060298fa7a7b2728eee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e8825dd11eeb6865b110baf21f2866865221f0a675592060298fa7a7b2728eee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3482-3331</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071444$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernard-Tessier, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champiat, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollebecque, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postel-Vinay, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varga, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahleda, Rastilav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzah, Anas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michot, Jean-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribrag, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armand, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marabelle, Aurélien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soria, Jean-Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massard, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of long-term responders to anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 when being rechallenged with the same anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 at progression</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Long-term responders have been observed with anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD(L)1). Optimal duration of therapy in responding and stable disease (SD) patients is unclear with various attitudes encompassing treatment until progression disease, stopping therapy after a defined timeframe. We report the experience of 13 patients who discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitor in phase I trials as per protocol while experiencing a tumour-controlled disease. According to protocols, patients could restart the same immunotherapy if radiological or clinical progression occurred. Patients were treated for colorectal microsatellite instability–high genotype (n = 5), urothelial carcinoma (n = 3), melanoma (n = 2), non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 2) and triple-negative breast cancer (n = 1) for a median time of 12 months (range 10.6–12). Patients achieved 1 (8%) complete response, 10 (77%) partial response (PR) and 2 (15%) SD. The median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) defined as the time from the first infusion until progression was 24.4 months (range 15.8–49). The median time free-treatment after discontinuation was 12.6 months (range 4–39.7). Eight patients experienced disease progression and were retreated. Best responses observed after rechallenging were 2 PR (25%) and 6 SD (75%). Median PFS2 defined from the first day of retreatment until disease progression or the last news was 12.9 months (range 5–35.4). No grade 3/4 events occurred during the study period. Our data suggest that anti–PD(L)1 therapy should be resumed if progression occurs after a planned anti–PD(L)1 interruption. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. •Managing disease progression after a planned interruption of immunotherapy among long-term responders remains unclear.•Eight patients were rechallenged with the same immunotherapy for disease progression.•Rechallenge is associated with a shorter progression-free survival.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>B7-H1 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>B7-H1 Antigen - immunology</subject><subject>Bladder cancer</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Immunotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Long-term follow-up</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Microsatellite instability</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>PD-1 protein</subject><subject>Programmed cell death 1 ligand</subject><subject>Programmed cell death 1 receptor</subject><subject>Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - immunology</subject><subject>Reinduction</subject><subject>Retreatment</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urothelial carcinoma</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqlkcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCC3BAlrhwSRh7E9uRuKAKKFKlXsrZcpJJ1lFiL7ZD1ZfsM-GwhQMSXDh5NP83_1jzE_KKQcmAiXdTiVNnSg5MlSBKgPoJ2TElmwJUzZ-SHTR1UyiomnPyPMYJAKSq4Bk53-eKVVW1Iw83a-r8gpH6gc7ejUXCsNCA8ehdjyHS5KlxyRbH4MdglgV72qNJB8pyv_-LNttxExm9O6CjLVo3Zs_uYOYZ3ZixO5updEAazYL_s8Ak-lPEGK13L8jZYOaILx_fC_L108fby6vi-ubzl8sP10W3V1UqUCle9z1jiK1Qom4Zg9YMnA1cia3BcwlGyLpuOAjgjRqMNLLlkitE3F-QtyffvPvbijHpxcYO59k49GvUHNRecqEYz-ibP9DJr8Hl32nOmKwZVBIyxU9UF3yMAQd9DHYx4V4z0FvaetJb2npLW4PQOe089PrRem3zaX6P_Io3A-9PAOZbfLcYdOwsug57m9NIuvf2X_4_AIICvUE</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Bernard-Tessier, A.</creator><creator>Baldini, C.</creator><creator>Martin, Patricia</creator><creator>Champiat, Stéphane</creator><creator>Hollebecque, Antoine</creator><creator>Postel-Vinay, Sophie</creator><creator>Varga, Andrea</creator><creator>Bahleda, Rastilav</creator><creator>Gazzah, Anas</creator><creator>Michot, Jean-Marie</creator><creator>Ribrag, Vincent</creator><creator>Armand, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Marabelle, Aurélien</creator><creator>Soria, Jean-Charles</creator><creator>Massard, C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3482-3331</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Outcomes of long-term responders to anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 when being rechallenged with the same anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 at progression</title><author>Bernard-Tessier, A. ; Baldini, C. ; Martin, Patricia ; Champiat, Stéphane ; Hollebecque, Antoine ; Postel-Vinay, Sophie ; Varga, Andrea ; Bahleda, Rastilav ; Gazzah, Anas ; Michot, Jean-Marie ; Ribrag, Vincent ; Armand, Jean-Pierre ; Marabelle, Aurélien ; Soria, Jean-Charles ; Massard, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e8825dd11eeb6865b110baf21f2866865221f0a675592060298fa7a7b2728eee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>B7-H1 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>B7-H1 Antigen - immunology</topic><topic>Bladder cancer</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Immunotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Long-term follow-up</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Microsatellite instability</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>PD-1 protein</topic><topic>Programmed cell death 1 ligand</topic><topic>Programmed cell death 1 receptor</topic><topic>Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - immunology</topic><topic>Reinduction</topic><topic>Retreatment</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urothelial carcinoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernard-Tessier, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champiat, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollebecque, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postel-Vinay, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varga, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahleda, Rastilav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzah, Anas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michot, Jean-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribrag, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armand, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marabelle, Aurélien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soria, Jean-Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massard, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernard-Tessier, A.</au><au>Baldini, C.</au><au>Martin, Patricia</au><au>Champiat, Stéphane</au><au>Hollebecque, Antoine</au><au>Postel-Vinay, Sophie</au><au>Varga, Andrea</au><au>Bahleda, Rastilav</au><au>Gazzah, Anas</au><au>Michot, Jean-Marie</au><au>Ribrag, Vincent</au><au>Armand, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Marabelle, Aurélien</au><au>Soria, Jean-Charles</au><au>Massard, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of long-term responders to anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 when being rechallenged with the same anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 at progression</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>160</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>160-164</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Long-term responders have been observed with anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD(L)1). Optimal duration of therapy in responding and stable disease (SD) patients is unclear with various attitudes encompassing treatment until progression disease, stopping therapy after a defined timeframe. We report the experience of 13 patients who discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitor in phase I trials as per protocol while experiencing a tumour-controlled disease. According to protocols, patients could restart the same immunotherapy if radiological or clinical progression occurred. Patients were treated for colorectal microsatellite instability–high genotype (n = 5), urothelial carcinoma (n = 3), melanoma (n = 2), non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 2) and triple-negative breast cancer (n = 1) for a median time of 12 months (range 10.6–12). Patients achieved 1 (8%) complete response, 10 (77%) partial response (PR) and 2 (15%) SD. The median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) defined as the time from the first infusion until progression was 24.4 months (range 15.8–49). The median time free-treatment after discontinuation was 12.6 months (range 4–39.7). Eight patients experienced disease progression and were retreated. Best responses observed after rechallenging were 2 PR (25%) and 6 SD (75%). Median PFS2 defined from the first day of retreatment until disease progression or the last news was 12.9 months (range 5–35.4). No grade 3/4 events occurred during the study period. Our data suggest that anti–PD(L)1 therapy should be resumed if progression occurs after a planned anti–PD(L)1 interruption. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. •Managing disease progression after a planned interruption of immunotherapy among long-term responders remains unclear.•Eight patients were rechallenged with the same immunotherapy for disease progression.•Rechallenge is associated with a shorter progression-free survival.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30071444</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3482-3331</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8049
ispartof European journal of cancer (1990), 2018-09, Vol.101, p.160-164
issn 0959-8049
1879-0852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2083726812
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology
Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use
Apoptosis
B7-H1 Antigen - antagonists & inhibitors
B7-H1 Antigen - immunology
Bladder cancer
Breast cancer
Cancer
Clinical trials
Death
Disease control
Disease Progression
Female
Genotypes
Humans
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy - methods
Ligands
Long-term follow-up
Lung cancer
Male
Medical treatment
Melanoma
Microsatellite instability
Middle Aged
Mortality
Neoplasms - classification
Neoplasms - immunology
Neoplasms - therapy
Oncology
Patients
PD-1 protein
Programmed cell death 1 ligand
Programmed cell death 1 receptor
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists & inhibitors
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - immunology
Reinduction
Retreatment
Stability
Therapy
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Urothelial carcinoma
title Outcomes of long-term responders to anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 when being rechallenged with the same anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 at progression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A39%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20long-term%20responders%20to%20anti-programmed%20death%201%20and%20anti-programmed%20death%20ligand%201%20when%20being%20rechallenged%20with%20the%20same%20anti-programmed%20death%201%20and%20anti-programmed%20death%20ligand%201%20at%20progression&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Bernard-Tessier,%20A.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=160-164&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117510470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117510470&rft_id=info:pmid/30071444&rft_els_id=S0959804918308979&rfr_iscdi=true