Outcomes of long-term responders to anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 when being rechallenged with the same anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 at progression
Long-term responders have been observed with anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD(L)1). Optimal duration of therapy in responding and stable disease (SD) patients is unclear with various attitudes encompassing treatment until progression disease, stopping therapy after...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of cancer (1990) 2018-09, Vol.101, p.160-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Long-term responders have been observed with anti-programmed death 1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD(L)1). Optimal duration of therapy in responding and stable disease (SD) patients is unclear with various attitudes encompassing treatment until progression disease, stopping therapy after a defined timeframe.
We report the experience of 13 patients who discontinued immune checkpoint inhibitor in phase I trials as per protocol while experiencing a tumour-controlled disease. According to protocols, patients could restart the same immunotherapy if radiological or clinical progression occurred.
Patients were treated for colorectal microsatellite instability–high genotype (n = 5), urothelial carcinoma (n = 3), melanoma (n = 2), non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 2) and triple-negative breast cancer (n = 1) for a median time of 12 months (range 10.6–12). Patients achieved 1 (8%) complete response, 10 (77%) partial response (PR) and 2 (15%) SD. The median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) defined as the time from the first infusion until progression was 24.4 months (range 15.8–49). The median time free-treatment after discontinuation was 12.6 months (range 4–39.7). Eight patients experienced disease progression and were retreated. Best responses observed after rechallenging were 2 PR (25%) and 6 SD (75%). Median PFS2 defined from the first day of retreatment until disease progression or the last news was 12.9 months (range 5–35.4). No grade 3/4 events occurred during the study period.
Our data suggest that anti–PD(L)1 therapy should be resumed if progression occurs after a planned anti–PD(L)1 interruption. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
•Managing disease progression after a planned interruption of immunotherapy among long-term responders remains unclear.•Eight patients were rechallenged with the same immunotherapy for disease progression.•Rechallenge is associated with a shorter progression-free survival. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.005 |