Evaluation of the Integrated Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Prerequisite Core Surgical Training Experience: A Residentsʼ Perspective

BACKGROUNDA key educational component of the integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) training model is the prerequisite, or core, experiences. The aim of this study is to assess the integrated PRS residentsʼ experience with this early part of training. METHODSA 20-question survey was dev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2018-10, Vol.81 (4), p.475-481
Hauptverfasser: Pfaff, Miles J, Morrison, Shane D, Rezzadeh, Kameron, Januszyk, Michael, Delong, Michael R, Lee, Justine C, Rudkin, George
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDA key educational component of the integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) training model is the prerequisite, or core, experiences. The aim of this study is to assess the integrated PRS residentsʼ experience with this early part of training. METHODSA 20-question survey was developed and piloted before deployment to integrated PRS training programs from 4 United States Census regions. Respondents were asked to characterize their prerequisite clinical and operative experiences. Results were analyzed using pairwise correlation statistics and logistic regression modeling following Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing. RESULTSOne hundred ninety six residents (22 programs) participated in the study (response rate, 65.3%). The majority of residents were satisfied with their prerequisite experiences. Most did not take the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, which was perceived as noncontributory to PRS training. The majority of residents preferred to have fewer prerequisite experiences. Operative hours per week were predictive of resident satisfaction with the clinical and operative prerequisite experiences (both P < 0.001). Perception of general surgery program director investment in PRS education was also predictive of resident satisfaction with clinical and operative experiences (P = 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONSThe present study demonstrates that PRS residents are satisfied with the quality of prerequisite training but prefer less overall. Reevaluation of the benefits of the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination and individual essential rotations for resident education would be welcomed. Furthermore, this study identifies the residentsʼ clinical and operative experience and perceived general surgery program director involvement as important determinants of integrated resident satisfaction with prerequisite training.
ISSN:0148-7043
1536-3708
DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001577