Evaluation of multiple linear, neural network and penalised regression models for prediction of rice yield based on weather parameters for west coast of India

Rice is generally grown under completely flooded condition and providing food for more than half of the world’s population. Any changes in weather parameters might affect the rice productivity thereby impacting the food security of burgeoning population. So, the crop yield forecasting based on weath...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of biometeorology 2018-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1809-1822
Hauptverfasser: Das, Bappa, Nair, Bhakti, Reddy, Viswanatha K., Venkatesh, Paramesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rice is generally grown under completely flooded condition and providing food for more than half of the world’s population. Any changes in weather parameters might affect the rice productivity thereby impacting the food security of burgeoning population. So, the crop yield forecasting based on weather parameters will help farmers, policy makers and administrators to manage adversities. The present investigation examines the application of stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR), artificial neural network (ANN) solely and in combination with principal components analysis (PCA) and penalised regression models (e.g. least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) or elastic net (ENET)) for rice yield prediction using long-term weather data. The R 2 and root mean square error (RMSE) of the models varied between 0.22–0.98 and 24.02–607.29 kg ha −1 , respectively during calibration. During validation with independent dataset, the RMSE and normalised root mean square error (nRMSE) ranged between 21.35–981.89 kg ha −1 and 0.98–36.7%, respectively. For evaluation of multiple models for multiple locations statistically, overall average ranks on the basis of R 2 and RMSE of calibration; RMSE and nRMSE of validation were calculated and non-parametric Friedman test was applied to check the significant difference among the models. The ranking of the models revealed that LASSO (2.63) was the best performing model followed by ENET (3.07) while PCA-ANN (4.19) was the worst model which was found significant at p  
ISSN:0020-7128
1432-1254
DOI:10.1007/s00484-018-1583-6