A Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate, Radiofrequency Ablation and Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Superficial Venous Incompetence: Two Year Follow up Results

To compare early and two year results for N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in the treatment of varicose veins. This was a randomised clinical trial. Five hundred and twenty five patients were blindly randomised into NBCA, RFA, and EVLT groups (175 patients to each group; block randomisation using sealed envelopes). Four hundred and fifty six patients were monitored for 2 years (ultrasound at 2 days, and 6, 12, and 24 months). The primary endpoint was the saphenous vein occlusion rates, and the secondary endpoints were peri- and post-procedural pain, complications, and time to return to work. No simultaneous phlebectomies were performed. The numbers of patients lost to follow up were NBCA seven, RFA 26, and EVLA 36. Occlusion rates were similar at 6, 12, and 24 months (6 months [NBCA 98.1%, RFA 94.1%, and EVLA 95.1%, p = .14], 1 year [NBCA 94.7%, RFA 92.5%, and EVLA 94.2%, p = .72], 2 years [NBCA 92.6%, RFA 90.9%, and EVLA 91.5%, p = .89]). Peri-procedural pain was significantly lower after NBCA (p