Screening values of carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment for lung cancer in combination with low-dose computed tomography in high-risk populations: Initial and 2-year screening outcomes

•LDCT + CEA had added screening value for lung cancer beyond LDCT alone.•LDCT + CEA had added screening value as high as LDCT + CEA/CYFRA 21-1.•CEA/CYFRA had benefit in initial & 2-year outcomes among indeterminate nodule.•CEA/CYFRA had benefit in initial outcome among positive LDCT group. To as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2018-08, Vol.122, p.243-248
Hauptverfasser: Triphuridet, Natthaya, Vidhyarkorn, Sirachat, Worakitsitisatorn, Akeanong, Sricharunrat, Thaniya, Teerayathanakul, Narongchai, Auewarakul, Chirayu, Chungklay, Naree, Krongthong, Warabhorn, Luengingkasoot, Supapun, Sornsamdang, Gaidganok, Patumanond, Jayanton, Sritipsukho, Paskorn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•LDCT + CEA had added screening value for lung cancer beyond LDCT alone.•LDCT + CEA had added screening value as high as LDCT + CEA/CYFRA 21-1.•CEA/CYFRA had benefit in initial & 2-year outcomes among indeterminate nodule.•CEA/CYFRA had benefit in initial outcome among positive LDCT group. To assess added screening value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) and Cytokeratin 19 Fragment (CYFRA 21-1) in combination with LDCT beyond LDCT alone and likelihood ratio of positive (LHR+) of their combination for lung cancer in high-risk populations with indeterminate and positive LDCT after initial screening and 2-year follow up. LDCT was performed annually at baseline and for 2 years in 634 heavy smokers (>30 pack-years) who were aged 50–70 years, and it was classified as negative, indeterminate, or positive (suspicious for lung cancer). Serum CEA and CYFRA 21-1 were examined and followed with LDCT in the indeterminate and positive LDCT groups and defined as positive with an abnormal level of either CEA or CYFRA 21-1. A total of 17 lung cancer cases were diagnosed (9 from initial screening and 8 from follow-up cycles). Seventy and 22 patients had indeterminate and positive baseline LDCT, respectively. Among indeterminate baseline LDCT, the LHR+ for lung cancer diagnosed after initial screening with a positive marker was 6.61 (p = .039) and 1.51 (p = .502) with a negative marker. After 2 years follow up, the LHR+ was 6.31 (p = .004) and 0.86 (p = .677), respectively. Among positive baseline LDCT, the LHR+ for lung cancer diagnosed after initial round with positive and negative markers was 69.44 (p 
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.05.012