Is BVA stifling free-reigning ethical debate?
Paul Roger argues that the structure for debating and endorsing new policy decisions at BVA is not fit for purpose, and that this should be reviewed and adapted so that it can meet today’s demands.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary record 2018-07, Vol.183 (3), p.102-103 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 103 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 102 |
| container_title | Veterinary record |
| container_volume | 183 |
| creator | Roger, Paul Fishwick, John |
| description | Paul Roger argues that the structure for debating and endorsing new policy decisions at BVA is not fit for purpose, and that this should be reviewed and adapted so that it can meet today’s demands. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/vr.k3179 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2073321356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2073246488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3422-6f8a6ef3ff928d1db058a46946281836382ef0702405b47f95fbf6b727f5787a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LAkEUhoco0izoF8RCN92szdfOzF6FipYgBGHeDjPujK3th82shv--XbWEwKvzHnh4z-EB4BbBLkKEPW5c95MgHp-BNoYUh5xxeA7asMk0hrAFrrxfQojjiOBL0CJ1ZIThNgjHPujPeoGvUpulxSKwzpjQmXRRNJupPtK5yoLEaFWZp2twYVXmzc1hdsD7aDgdvIST1-fxoDcJNaEYh8wKxYwl1sZYJCjRMBKKspgyLJAgjAhsLOQQUxhpym0cWW2Z5pjbiAuuSAc87HtXrvxaG1_JPPVzk2WqMOXaSww5IRiRiNXo_T90Wa5dUX-3ozBlVIhj4dyV3jtj5cqluXJbiaBsFMqNkzuFNXp3KFzr3CR_4K-zGkB74DvNzPZkkZwNp2_9UeMcH7_U-fL06R_At4Lr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2073246488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is BVA stifling free-reigning ethical debate?</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Roger, Paul ; Fishwick, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Roger, Paul ; Fishwick, John</creatorcontrib><description>Paul Roger argues that the structure for debating and endorsing new policy decisions at BVA is not fit for purpose, and that this should be reviewed and adapted so that it can meet today’s demands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-4900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/vr.k3179</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30026362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Limited</publisher><subject>Animal care ; Appointments & personnel changes ; Committees ; Councils ; Decision making ; Ethics ; Veterinary medicine ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>Veterinary record, 2018-07, Vol.183 (3), p.102-103</ispartof><rights>British Veterinary Association</rights><rights>British Veterinary Association 2018</rights><rights>British Veterinary Association.</rights><rights>British Veterinary Association2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1136%2Fvr.k3179$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1136%2Fvr.k3179$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roger, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishwick, John</creatorcontrib><title>Is BVA stifling free-reigning ethical debate?</title><title>Veterinary record</title><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><description>Paul Roger argues that the structure for debating and endorsing new policy decisions at BVA is not fit for purpose, and that this should be reviewed and adapted so that it can meet today’s demands.</description><subject>Animal care</subject><subject>Appointments & personnel changes</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>0042-4900</issn><issn>2042-7670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LAkEUhoco0izoF8RCN92szdfOzF6FipYgBGHeDjPujK3th82shv--XbWEwKvzHnh4z-EB4BbBLkKEPW5c95MgHp-BNoYUh5xxeA7asMk0hrAFrrxfQojjiOBL0CJ1ZIThNgjHPujPeoGvUpulxSKwzpjQmXRRNJupPtK5yoLEaFWZp2twYVXmzc1hdsD7aDgdvIST1-fxoDcJNaEYh8wKxYwl1sZYJCjRMBKKspgyLJAgjAhsLOQQUxhpym0cWW2Z5pjbiAuuSAc87HtXrvxaG1_JPPVzk2WqMOXaSww5IRiRiNXo_T90Wa5dUX-3ozBlVIhj4dyV3jtj5cqluXJbiaBsFMqNkzuFNXp3KFzr3CR_4K-zGkB74DvNzPZkkZwNp2_9UeMcH7_U-fL06R_At4Lr</recordid><startdate>20180721</startdate><enddate>20180721</enddate><creator>Roger, Paul</creator><creator>Fishwick, John</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Limited</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180721</creationdate><title>Is BVA stifling free-reigning ethical debate?</title><author>Roger, Paul ; Fishwick, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3422-6f8a6ef3ff928d1db058a46946281836382ef0702405b47f95fbf6b727f5787a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal care</topic><topic>Appointments & personnel changes</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roger, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishwick, John</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roger, Paul</au><au>Fishwick, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is BVA stifling free-reigning ethical debate?</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><date>2018-07-21</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>102-103</pages><issn>0042-4900</issn><eissn>2042-7670</eissn><abstract>Paul Roger argues that the structure for debating and endorsing new policy decisions at BVA is not fit for purpose, and that this should be reviewed and adapted so that it can meet today’s demands.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Limited</pub><pmid>30026362</pmid><doi>10.1136/vr.k3179</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0042-4900 |
| ispartof | Veterinary record, 2018-07, Vol.183 (3), p.102-103 |
| issn | 0042-4900 2042-7670 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2073321356 |
| source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Animal care Appointments & personnel changes Committees Councils Decision making Ethics Veterinary medicine Working groups |
| title | Is BVA stifling free-reigning ethical debate? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A01%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20BVA%20stifling%20free-reigning%20ethical%20debate?&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20record&rft.au=Roger,%20Paul&rft.date=2018-07-21&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=102-103&rft.issn=0042-4900&rft.eissn=2042-7670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/vr.k3179&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2073246488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2073246488&rft_id=info:pmid/30026362&rfr_iscdi=true |