Is BVA stifling free-reigning ethical debate?

Is BVA stifling free-reigning ethical debate?

Paul Roger argues that the structure for debating and endorsing new policy decisions at BVA is not fit for purpose, and that this should be reviewed and adapted so that it can meet today’s demands.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary record 2018-07, Vol.183 (3), p.102-103
Hauptverfasser: Roger, Paul, Fishwick, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Animal care
Appointments & personnel changes
Committees
Councils
Decision making
Ethics
Veterinary medicine
Working groups
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Paul Roger argues that the structure for debating and endorsing new policy decisions at BVA is not fit for purpose, and that this should be reviewed and adapted so that it can meet today’s demands.
ISSN:0042-4900
2042-7670
DOI:10.1136/vr.k3179