Soricid response to coarse woody debris manipulations in Coastal Plain loblolly pine forests
We assessed shrew (soricids) response to coarse woody debris (CWD) manipulations in managed upland loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda) stands in the upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina over multiple years and seasons. Using a completely randomized block design, we assigned one of the following treatments...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest ecology and management 2008-04, Vol.255 (7), p.2306-2311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We assessed shrew (soricids) response to coarse woody debris (CWD) manipulations in managed upland loblolly pine (
Pinus taeda) stands in the upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina over multiple years and seasons. Using a completely randomized block design, we assigned one of the following treatments to 12, 9.3-ha plots: removal (
n
=
3; all CWD
≥
10
cm in diameter and ≥60
cm long removed), downed (
n
=
3; 5-fold increase in volume of down CWD), snag (
n
=
3; 12-fold increase in standing dead CWD), and control (
n
=
3; unmanipulated). Therein, we sampled shrews during winter, spring, and summer seasons, 2003–2005, using drift-fence pitfall arrays. During 1680 drift-fence plot nights we captured 253
Blarina carolinensis, 154
Sorex longirostris, and 51
Cryptotis parva.
Blarina carolinensis capture rate was greater in control than in snag treatments.
Sorex longirostris capture rate was lower in removal than downed and control plots in 2005 whereas
C. parva capture rate did not differ among treatments. Overall, the CWD input treatments failed to elicit the positive soricid response we had expected. Lack of a positive response by soricid populations to our downed treatments may be attributable to the early CWD decay stage within these plots or an indication that within fire-adapted pine-dominated systems of the Southeast, reliance on CWD is less than in other forest types. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.043 |