Grazing by Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on phytoplankton and protozooplankton during the spring bloom in the Celtic Sea
Feeding rates and selectivity of the calanoid copepods Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on natural assemblages of microplankton were evaluated in the English Channel and western Celtic Sea during non-bloom and bloom conditions in April 2002. Ingestion rates of total chlorophyll- a w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology 2007-09, Vol.348 (1), p.70-84 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Feeding rates and selectivity of the calanoid copepods
Calanus helgolandicus and
Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on natural assemblages of microplankton were evaluated in the English Channel and western Celtic Sea during non-bloom and bloom conditions in April 2002. Ingestion rates of total chlorophyll-
a were low at non-bloom stations where the phytoplankton community was dominated by cells <
5 μm in length and higher during the bloom when the >
5 μm size fraction was dominant. Protozooplankton contributed to the copepod diet in all experiments,
C. helgolandicus clearance and ingestion rates were highest for the ciliate
Myrionecta rubra (626–1347 ml cop
−
1
d
−
1
; 0.3–27 μg C cop
−
1
d
−
1
).
C. helgolandicus ingested between 1 and 18 μg C cop
−
1
d
−
1
(1–12% body C) from phytoplankton
+
protozooplankton food sources. The total carbon ingested by
Para-Pseudocalanus spp. was lower (0.5–6 μg cop
−
1
d
−
1
) but this was equivalent to between 6 and 78% of body carbon being ingested daily. Our data suggest that
C. helgolandicus selected prey according to size; this was not the case for
Para-Pseudocalanus spp. which became more selective as chlorophyll-
a concentration increased. Grazing impact of the entire copepod community on protozooplankton was assessed. We found that at non-bloom stations between 12 and 17% of the protozooplankton community was being removed daily by the copepod community, whereas during the peak of the bloom the proportion being removed daily was only 2%. We conclude that during the spring bloom period copepods gained the majority of their carbon from phytoplankton ingestion but during non-bloom periods, protozooplankton and the ciliate
M. rubra made a significant contribution to copepod diet. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-0981 1879-1697 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.04.003 |