Grazing by Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on phytoplankton and protozooplankton during the spring bloom in the Celtic Sea

Feeding rates and selectivity of the calanoid copepods Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on natural assemblages of microplankton were evaluated in the English Channel and western Celtic Sea during non-bloom and bloom conditions in April 2002. Ingestion rates of total chlorophyll- a w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology 2007-09, Vol.348 (1), p.70-84
Hauptverfasser: Fileman, Elaine, Smith, Tania, Harris, Roger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Feeding rates and selectivity of the calanoid copepods Calanus helgolandicus and Para-Pseudocalanus spp. on natural assemblages of microplankton were evaluated in the English Channel and western Celtic Sea during non-bloom and bloom conditions in April 2002. Ingestion rates of total chlorophyll- a were low at non-bloom stations where the phytoplankton community was dominated by cells < 5 μm in length and higher during the bloom when the > 5 μm size fraction was dominant. Protozooplankton contributed to the copepod diet in all experiments, C. helgolandicus clearance and ingestion rates were highest for the ciliate Myrionecta rubra (626–1347 ml cop − 1 d − 1 ; 0.3–27 μg C cop − 1 d − 1 ). C. helgolandicus ingested between 1 and 18 μg C cop − 1 d − 1 (1–12% body C) from phytoplankton + protozooplankton food sources. The total carbon ingested by Para-Pseudocalanus spp. was lower (0.5–6 μg cop − 1 d − 1 ) but this was equivalent to between 6 and 78% of body carbon being ingested daily. Our data suggest that C. helgolandicus selected prey according to size; this was not the case for Para-Pseudocalanus spp. which became more selective as chlorophyll- a concentration increased. Grazing impact of the entire copepod community on protozooplankton was assessed. We found that at non-bloom stations between 12 and 17% of the protozooplankton community was being removed daily by the copepod community, whereas during the peak of the bloom the proportion being removed daily was only 2%. We conclude that during the spring bloom period copepods gained the majority of their carbon from phytoplankton ingestion but during non-bloom periods, protozooplankton and the ciliate M. rubra made a significant contribution to copepod diet.
ISSN:0022-0981
1879-1697
DOI:10.1016/j.jembe.2007.04.003