Two-Year Outcome with Nobel Direct registered Implants: A Retrospective Radiographic and Microbiologic Study in 10 Patients

ABSTRACTIntroduction: The Nobel Direct registered implant (Nobel Biocare AB, Goeteborg, Sweden) was developed to minimize marginal bone resorption and to result in 'soft tissue integration' for an optimized aesthetic outcome. However, conflicting results have been presented in the literatu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2009-09, Vol.11 (3), p.183-193
Hauptverfasser: Van de Velde, Tommie, Thevissen, Eric, Persson, GRutger, Johansson, Carina, De Bruyn, Hugo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACTIntroduction: The Nobel Direct registered implant (Nobel Biocare AB, Goeteborg, Sweden) was developed to minimize marginal bone resorption and to result in 'soft tissue integration' for an optimized aesthetic outcome. However, conflicting results have been presented in the literature. The aim of this present study was to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic outcomes of Nobel Direct implants.Materials and Methods: Ten partially edentulous subjects without evidence of active periodontitis (mean age 55 years) received 12 Nobel Direct implants. Implants were loaded with single crowns after a healing period of 3 to 6 months. Treatment outcomes were assessed at month 24. Routine clinical assessments, intraoral radiographs, and microbiologic samplings were made. Histologic analysis of one failing implant and chemical spectroscopy around three unused implants was performed. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the evaluation of bone loss; otherwise, descriptive analysis was performed.Results: Implants were functionally loaded after 3 to 6 months. At 2 years, the mean bone loss of remaining implants was 2.0 mm (SD plus or minus 1.1 mm; range: 0.0-3.4 mm). Three out of 12 implants with an early mean bone loss >3 mm were lost. The surviving implants showed increasing bone loss between 6 and 24 months (p = .028). Only 3 out of the 12 implants were considered successful and showed bone loss of
ISSN:1523-0899
1708-8208
DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00112.x