Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Screening Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A new meta-analysis review is needed to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). Eighteen studies were included in the review. The important parameters of CESM accuracy for breast cancer diagnosis were analyzed. CESM can be considered as a useful triage test fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical breast cancer 2018-10, Vol.18 (5), p.e985-e995
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Xiao, Huang, Jun-ming, Zhang, Kun, Xia, Long-jie, Feng, Lan, Yang, Ping, Zhang, Meng-ya, Xiao, Wei, Lin, Hui-xia, Yu, Ying-hua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A new meta-analysis review is needed to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). Eighteen studies were included in the review. The important parameters of CESM accuracy for breast cancer diagnosis were analyzed. CESM can be considered as a useful triage test for initial assessment of breast lesions. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a new image examination technology that has developed over the past few years. As CESM technology keeps improving, a current meta-analysis review is needed to systematically evaluate the potential diagnostic value of CESM. A total of 18 studies were included in the review. Sensitivity, specificity, and other important parameters of CESM accuracy for breast cancer diagnosis were pooled and analyzed using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for overall accuracy estimation. The summary estimates for CESM in the diagnosis of breast cancer were as follows: the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.91) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.82-0.85), respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 (95% CI, 2.68-5.20), negative likelihood ratio was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.06-0.15), and diagnostic odds ratio was 71.36 (95% CI, 36.28-140.39). The area under the curve was 0.96 (standard error = 0.011). CESM has a high diagnostic accuracy for evaluating breast cancer and can be considered as a useful test for initial assessment of breast lesions.
ISSN:1526-8209
1938-0666
DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2018.06.003