Stereotactic radiosurgery and immunotherapy in melanoma brain metastases: Patterns of care and treatment outcomes
Preclinical studies have suggested that radiation therapy (RT) enhances antitumor immune response and can act synergistically when administered with immunotherapy. However, this effect in melanoma brain metastasis is not well studied. We aim to explore the clinical effect of combining RT and immunot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2018-08, Vol.128 (2), p.266-273 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Preclinical studies have suggested that radiation therapy (RT) enhances antitumor immune response and can act synergistically when administered with immunotherapy. However, this effect in melanoma brain metastasis is not well studied. We aim to explore the clinical effect of combining RT and immunotherapy in patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM).
Patients with MBM between 2011 and 2013 were obtained from the National Cancer Database. Patients who did not have identifiable sites of metastasis and who did not receive RT for the treatment of their MBM were excluded. Patients were separated into cohorts that received immunotherapy versus patients who did not. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using Cox model to determine predictors of OS. Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare OS. Univariable and multivariable analyses using logistic regression model were used to determine the factors predictive for the use of immunotherapy. Propensity score analysis was used to account for differences in baseline patient characteristics between the RT and RT + immunotherapy groups. Significance was defined as a P value ≤ 0.05.
A total of 1104 patients were identified: 912 received RT alone and 192 received RT plus immunotherapy. The median follow-up time was 6.4 (0.1–56.8) months. Patients with extracranial disease (OR 1.603, 95% CI 1.146–2.243, P = 0.006), and patients receiving SRS (OR 1.955, 95% CI 1.410–2.711, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.017 |