Dextromethorphan/Quinidine for Pseudobulbar Affect Following Stroke: Safety and Effectiveness in the PRISM II Trial
Background Dextromethorphan (DM) / quinidine (Q) was approved for pseudobulbar affect (PBA) treatment based on efficacy and safety trials in patients with PBA caused by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or multiple sclerosis. The PRISM II trial evaluated DM/Q as PBA treatment in patients with stroke, de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PM & R 2019-01, Vol.11 (1), p.17-24 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Dextromethorphan (DM) / quinidine (Q) was approved for pseudobulbar affect (PBA) treatment based on efficacy and safety trials in patients with PBA caused by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or multiple sclerosis. The PRISM II trial evaluated DM/Q as PBA treatment in patients with stroke, dementia, or traumatic brain injury.
Objective
To report results from the stroke cohort of PRISM II, including the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS).
Design
Open‐label trial evaluating twice‐daily DM/Q over 90 days.
Study participants
Adults (n = 113) with a clinical diagnosis of PBA secondary to stroke; stable psychiatric medications were allowed.
Methods
PRISM II was an open‐label, 12‐week trial enrolling adults with PBA caused by dementia, stroke (reported here), or TBI. All study participants received DM/Q 20/10 mg twice daily. Study visits occurred at baseline and at days 30 and 90.
Setting
150 U.S. centers.
Main Outcome Measurements
Primary efficacy measure was changed from baseline to day 90 in Center for Neurologic Study‐Lability Scale (CNS‐LS) scores. Secondary outcomes included PBA episodes (estimated over 7 days), Clinical and Patient/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGI‐C and PGI‐C), Quality of Life‐Visual Analog Scale (QOL‐VAS), SIS, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ‐9), and Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Results
Compared with baseline, CNS‐LS scores (SD) improved by −6.2 (6.1, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1934-1482 1934-1563 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.003 |