T-Track-CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV assays for prediction of protection from CMV reactivation in kidney transplant recipients

•T-Track-CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV enable functional assessment of cell-mediated immunity.•T-Track-CMV better predictor of CMV reactivation in kidney transplant recipients.•High immediate early protein-1 responses indicate protection against reactivation. Assays detecting CMV-specific cell-mediated im...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical virology 2018-08, Vol.105, p.91-96
Hauptverfasser: Gliga, Smaranda, Korth, Johannes, Krawczyk, Adalbert, Wilde, Benjamin, Horn, Peter A., Witzke, Oliver, Lindemann, Monika, Fiedler, Melanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•T-Track-CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV enable functional assessment of cell-mediated immunity.•T-Track-CMV better predictor of CMV reactivation in kidney transplant recipients.•High immediate early protein-1 responses indicate protection against reactivation. Assays detecting CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) may support the current management of CMV infection in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients, by allowing a better risk assessment and adjusting antiviral treatment. The primary endpoint was the performance of two tests measuring CMV-specific interferon-gamma production, both approved for commercial use in clinical settings. Secondarily, we determined a cut-off for the cellular immune response, which protects against CMV reactivation/infection. Thirty kidney transplant (KTx) patients were stratified according to their CMV-IgG status pre-transplantation (Tx) and were divided into two groups: pre-emptive (donor-/recipient+, donor+/recipient+) and prophylaxis (donor+/recipient−). An ELISpot (T-Track-CMV) was performed at month 1 post-Tx (pre-emptive group) and end of prophylaxis and one month thereafter (prophylaxis group). An ELISA (QuantiFERON-CMV) was performed every 2–4 weeks (pre-emptive) or monthly (prophylaxis), in parallel to the CMV viral load (PCR). A good positive agreement was obtained between the QuantiFERON-CMV or T-Track-CMV and the CMV-IgG (kappa = 0.839 and 0.824, respectively). A cut-off of 19.5 spot forming units (SFU)/200,000 lymphocytes for the T-Track-CMV IE-1 (AUC = 0.802, sensitivity 45%, specificity 100%) and 495 SFU/200,000 lymphocytes for the T-Track-CMV pp65 (AUC = 0.617, sensitivity 11%, specificity 100%) was defined to assess protection against reactivation. The QuantiFERON-CMV performed modestly (AUC = 0.477, cut-off 85.1 IU/ml). The QuantiFERON-CMV and T-Track-CMV enable the functional assessment of CMV-specific CMI in KTx recipients. In combination with CMV viral load monitoring, T-Track-CMV results could stratify patients at risk of CMV reactivation/infection.
ISSN:1386-6532
1873-5967
DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2018.06.009