Effect of radiofrequency on epicardial myocardium after ablation of ventricular arrhythmias from within coronary sinus

Background Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (IVA) from the coronary venous system (CVS) has been increasingly performed, but real effect of ablation lesions from CVS on epicardial myocardium has not been studied. Objective To compare effects of RF delivered inside t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2018-09, Vol.41 (9), p.1060-1068
Hauptverfasser: Candemir, Basar, Ozyurek, Elif, Vurgun, Kutay, Turan, Nazli, Duzen, Veysel, Goksuluk, Huseyin, Ozyuncu, Nil, Kurklu, Seda, Altin, Timucin, Akyurek, Omer, Erol, Cetin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (IVA) from the coronary venous system (CVS) has been increasingly performed, but real effect of ablation lesions from CVS on epicardial myocardium has not been studied. Objective To compare effects of RF delivered inside the distal CVS during ablation of IVAs originating from left ventricular summit (LVS) with IVAs ablated from right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). Methods Twenty consecutive patients with IVAs who underwent acutely successful RF ablation at initial appropriate sites, i.e., distal CVS (Group 1, n = 10) or RVOT (Group 2; n = 10) were enrolled. Detailed contrast‐enhanced CMRI of each patient was performed 3 months later. Presence and location of scars, distance of CVS to epicardial ventricular myocardium were measured and analyzed. Results Group 1 consisted of 10 and Group 2 consisted of 10 patients. Three months after the ablation, only three patients in Group 1 had detectable late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMRI while nine out of 10 patients in Group 2 had evident LGE on CMRI (P: 0.02). The mean distance of distal CVS to epicardial anterobasal myocardium was measured to be 8.8 ± 1.6 mm in Group 1. In three cases that had detectable scar on superior anterobasal LV epicardium, the mean distance was 7.4 ± 1.1 mm. Conclusions RF delivery inside the CVS is less likely to produce detectable LGE on CMRI compared to RVOT. This may partially explain less than ideal long‐term results after ablation of LVS IVAs from within the great cardiac vein/anterior interventricular vein.
ISSN:0147-8389
1540-8159
DOI:10.1111/pace.13429