Early readmission and reoperation characteristics of ambulatory hypospadias repair

Hypospadias is a common birth defect. It is present in about 34.2 in 10,000 live births in North America. However, few studies have evaluated the immediate reoperation and readmission rates following elective repair. This study aimed to define the rates of readmission and reoperation following elect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric urology 2018-12, Vol.14 (6), p.532.e1-532.e7
Hauptverfasser: Roth, J.D., Whittam, B.M., Carroll, A.E., Szymanski, K.M., Misseri, R., Cain, M.P., Bennett, W.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hypospadias is a common birth defect. It is present in about 34.2 in 10,000 live births in North America. However, few studies have evaluated the immediate reoperation and readmission rates following elective repair. This study aimed to define the rates of readmission and reoperation following elective hypospadias repair, to improve pre-operative counseling on risks of the procedure. The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) was interrogated from 2004 to 2015 for all elective hypospadias repairs (ICD-9-CM code 58.45) performed in the ambulatory surgical setting. The following were then determined: age at initial operation, insurance status, race, presence or absence of readmission or reoperation within 30 days, presence of repeat hypospadias repair (same ICD-9 code), and presence or absence of another urethral operation (ICD-9 CM code 58.XX, excluding 58.45). Mixed effects logistic regression were then performed with dependent variables of 30-day repeat encounter, 30-day emergency department (ED) visit, 30-day readmission, or 30-day reoperation; and independent variables of age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status. The study identified 45,264 hypospadias repairs during 2004–2015 performed in 43 hospitals. Within 30 days of the procedures, 2826 (6.2%) had additional encounters in the ED at the same facilities, and 546 (1.2%) had readmissions. A total of 105 (0.2%) underwent second anesthetic within the first 30 days. With regards to a 30-day repeat encounter, odds of repeat encounter were significantly increased in patients aged
ISSN:1477-5131
1873-4898
DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.05.003