Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: Implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling
Removal of 28 human and veterinary antibiotics was assessed in a conventional (activated sludge) and advanced (microfiltration/reverse osmosis) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Brisbane, Australia. The dominant antibiotics detected in wastewater influents were cephalexin (med. 4.6 μg L −1, freq....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2007-10, Vol.41 (18), p.4164-4176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Removal of 28 human and veterinary antibiotics was assessed in a conventional (activated sludge) and advanced (microfiltration/reverse osmosis) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Brisbane, Australia. The dominant antibiotics detected in wastewater influents were cephalexin (med. 4.6
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), ciprofloxacin (med. 3.8
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), cefaclor (med. 0.5
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), sulphamethoxazole (med. 0.36
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%) and trimethoprim (med. 0.34
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%). Results indicated that both treatment plants significantly reduced antibiotic concentrations with an average removal rate from the liquid phase of 92%. However, antibiotics were still detected in both effluents from the low-to-mid ng
L
−1 range. Antibiotics detected in effluent from the activated sludge WWTP included ciprofloxacin (med. 0.6
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), sulphamethoxazole (med. 0.27
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%) lincomycin (med. 0.05
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%) and trimethoprim (med. 0.05
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%). Antibiotics identified in microfiltration/reverse osmosis product water included naladixic acid (med. 0.045
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), enrofloxacin (med. 0.01
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), roxithromycin (med. 0.01
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), norfloxacin (med. 0.005
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), oleandomycin (med. 0.005
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), trimethoprim (med. 0.005
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), tylosin (med. 0.001
μg
L
−1, freq. 100%), and lincomycin (med. 0.001
μg
L
−1, freq. 66%). Certain traditional parameters, including nitrate concentration, conductivity and turbidity of the effluent were assessed as predictors of total antibiotic concentration, however only conductivity demonstrated any correlation with total antibiotic concentration (
p=0.018,
r=0.7). There is currently a lack of information concerning the effects of these chemicals to critically assess potential risks for environmental discharge and water recycling. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.005 |