Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC): Patient/Family‐informed Research Priorities for Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Background A growing body of literature supports patient and public involvement in the design, prioritization, and dissemination of research and evidence‐based medicine. The objectives of this project were to engage patients and families in developing a prioritized list of research topics for pediat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic emergency medicine 2018-12, Vol.25 (12), p.1365-1374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
A growing body of literature supports patient and public involvement in the design, prioritization, and dissemination of research and evidence‐based medicine. The objectives of this project were to engage patients and families in developing a prioritized list of research topics for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) and to compare results with prior research prioritization initiatives in the emergency department (ED) setting.
Methods
We utilized a systematic process to combine administrative data on frequency of patient presentations to the ED with multiple stakeholder input including an initial stakeholder survey followed by a modified Delphi consensus methodology consisting of two Web‐based surveys and a face‐to‐face meeting.
Results
The prioritization process resulted in a ranked list of 15 research priorities. The top five priorities were mental health presentations, pain and sedation, practice tools, quality of care delivery, and resource utilization. Mental health, pain and sedation, clinical prediction rules, respiratory illnesses/wheeze, patient safety/medication error, and sepsis were identified as shared priorities with prior initiatives. Topics identified in our process that were not identified in prior work included resource utilization, ED communication, antibiotic stewardship, and patient/family adherence with recommendations.
Conclusions
This work identifies key priorities for research in PEM. Comparing our results with prior initiatives in the ED setting identified shared research priorities and opportunities for collaboration among PEM research networks. This work in particular makes an important contribution to the existing literature by including the patient/family perspective missing from prior work. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1069-6563 1553-2712 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acem.13493 |