Balloon sizing during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Comparison of different valve morphologies

Background Although balloon sizing has been found to be useful during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), its effectiveness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV) remains unknown. Methods Patients who underwent balloon sizing were retrospectively identified. The study comprised 67...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Herz 2020-04, Vol.45 (2), p.192-198
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Y.-N., Xiong, T.-Y., Li, Y.-J., Liao, Y.-B., Zhao, Z.-G., Wei, X., Feng, Y., Chen, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although balloon sizing has been found to be useful during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), its effectiveness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV) remains unknown. Methods Patients who underwent balloon sizing were retrospectively identified. The study comprised 67 patients (61.2% with BiAV). Preprocedural hypothetical transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizing was based on multislice computed tomography (MSCT) measurements at the annulus. Changes in valve size after balloon sizing were reviewed. Postprocedural MSCT measurements and the grade of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) were compared. Results When comparing patients with a BiAV and those with a tricuspid aortic valve (TiAV), there was no significant difference ( p  = 0.97) in the proportion of decreased (43.9% vs. 46.2%), unchanged (51.2% vs. 50.0%), or increased (4.9% vs. 3.8%) valve sizes chosen on the basis of MSCT findings. The anticipated annular sizing ratio for patients who received a smaller valve was 7.2% (3.5–10.5%) while it was 15.7% (12.5–19.0) for the others ( p  
ISSN:0340-9937
1615-6692
DOI:10.1007/s00059-018-4714-2