Balloon sizing during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Comparison of different valve morphologies
Background Although balloon sizing has been found to be useful during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), its effectiveness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV) remains unknown. Methods Patients who underwent balloon sizing were retrospectively identified. The study comprised 67...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Herz 2020-04, Vol.45 (2), p.192-198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Although balloon sizing has been found to be useful during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), its effectiveness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV) remains unknown.
Methods
Patients who underwent balloon sizing were retrospectively identified. The study comprised 67 patients (61.2% with BiAV). Preprocedural hypothetical transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizing was based on multislice computed tomography (MSCT) measurements at the annulus. Changes in valve size after balloon sizing were reviewed. Postprocedural MSCT measurements and the grade of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) were compared.
Results
When comparing patients with a BiAV and those with a tricuspid aortic valve (TiAV), there was no significant difference (
p
= 0.97) in the proportion of decreased (43.9% vs. 46.2%), unchanged (51.2% vs. 50.0%), or increased (4.9% vs. 3.8%) valve sizes chosen on the basis of MSCT findings. The anticipated annular sizing ratio for patients who received a smaller valve was 7.2% (3.5–10.5%) while it was 15.7% (12.5–19.0) for the others (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0340-9937 1615-6692 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00059-018-4714-2 |