Prognostic values of fasting hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome: A prospective cohort study

Background: Controversy remains regarding the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome and its prognostic value for long-term outcomes. Methods and results: We evaluated the prevalence of hyperglycaemia (defined as fasting glycaemia ⩾10 mmol/l)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care 2020-09, Vol.9 (6), p.589-598
Hauptverfasser: Gencer, Baris, Rigamonti, Fabio, Nanchen, David, Klingenberg, Roland, Räber, Lorenz, Moutzouri, Elisavet, Auer, Reto, Carballo, David, Heg, Dik, Windecker, Stephan, Lüscher, Thomas Felix, Matter, Christian M, Rodondi, Nicolas, Mach, François, Roffi, Marco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Controversy remains regarding the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome and its prognostic value for long-term outcomes. Methods and results: We evaluated the prevalence of hyperglycaemia (defined as fasting glycaemia ⩾10 mmol/l) among patients with no known diabetes at the time of enrolment in the prospective Special Program University Medicine-Acute Coronary Syndromes cohort, as well as its impact on all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and incidence of diabetes at one year. Among 3858 acute coronary syndrome patients enrolled between December 2009–December 2014, 709 (18.4%) had known diabetes, while 112 (3.6%) of non-diabetic patients had hyperglycaemia at admission. Compared with non-hyperglycaemic patients, hyperglycaemic individuals were more likely to present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and acute heart failure. At discharge, hyperglycaemic patients were more frequently treated with glucose-lowering agents (8.9% vs 0.66%, p
ISSN:2048-8726
2048-8734
DOI:10.1177/2048872618777819