A New Standard of Care for Advanced Lung Cancer
In 1995, the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group published a landmark meta-analysis involving eight randomized trials that compared chemotherapy with no therapy or best supportive care for the first-line treatment of metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 1 This meta-analysis not...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2018-05, Vol.378 (22), p.2135-2137 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In 1995, the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group published a landmark meta-analysis involving eight randomized trials that compared chemotherapy with no therapy or best supportive care for the first-line treatment of metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
1
This meta-analysis not only showed the poor outcomes of patients with untreated NSCLC (5% overall survival at 1 year) but also showed that cisplatin-based chemotherapy could affect the natural history of this disease (15% overall survival at 1 year). Multiple subsequent trials have since compared different chemotherapy regimens, with small but incremental improvements in overall survival. One phase 3 trial showed a median . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMe1804364 |