Bacterial response to spatially organized microtopographic surface patterns with nanometer scale roughness
[Display omitted] •Bacteria respond to topographic patterns by maximising their contact area with the surface.•The geometry of the surface features determines the initial location of the adhering cells.•Uniform nanoscale surface roughness renders textured surfaces less attractive to the cells.•Engin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Colloids and surfaces, B, Biointerfaces B, Biointerfaces, 2018-09, Vol.169, p.340-347 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Bacteria respond to topographic patterns by maximising their contact area with the surface.•The geometry of the surface features determines the initial location of the adhering cells.•Uniform nanoscale surface roughness renders textured surfaces less attractive to the cells.•Engineered topographies with nanometer roughness show significant antifouling properties.
In this study, the influence of nanometer scale roughness on bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation has been evaluated using spatially organized microtopographic surface patterns for four major opportunistic pathogens of the genus Staphylococcus (S. epidermidis and S. aureus) responsible for associated-biofilm infections on biomedical devices. The results presented demonstrated that regardless of the strain employed the initial adhesion events to these surfaces are directed by cell-surface contact points maximisation and thus, bacterial cells actively choose their position to settle based on that principle. Accordingly, bacterial cells were found to preferably adhere to the square corners and convex walls of recessed surface features rather than the flat or concave walls of equal protruding features. This finding reveals, for the first time, that the particular shape of the surfaces features employed potentially determined the initial location of the adhering cells on textured surfaces. It was further shown that all surfaces patterns investigated produce a significant reduction in bacterial adhesion (40–95%) and biofilm formation (22–58%). This important observation could not be related to physical constrains or increased solid surface hydrophobicity, as previously suggested by other authors using engineered topographies with microscale surface roughness. It is evident that other causes, such as nanoscale surface roughness-induced interaction energies, might be controlling the process of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on surfaces with well-defined nanoscale topography. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0927-7765 1873-4367 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.038 |