Optimal equation for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: influence of tolvaptan

Background The reliability of various equations for estimating the GFR in ADPKD patients and the influence of tolvaptan on the resulting estimates have not been examined when GFR is calculated on the basis of inulin clearance. Methods We obtained baseline and on-tolvaptan measured GFRs (mGFRs), calculated on the basis of inulin clearance, in 114 ADPKD, and these mGFRs were compared with eGFRs calculated according to four basic equations: the MDRD, CKD-EPI, and JSN-CKDI equations and the Cockcroft–Gault formula, as well as the influence of tolvaptan and of inclusion of cystatin C on accuracy of the results. Accuracy of each of the seven total equations was evaluated on the basis of the percentage of eGFR values within mGFR ± 30% (P 30 ). Results mGFRs were distributed throughout CKD stages 1–5. Regardless of the CKD stage, P 30 s of the MDRD, CKD-EPI, and JSN-CKDI equations did not differ significantly between baseline values and on-tolvaptan values. In CKD 1–2 patients, P 30 of the CKD-EPI equation was 100.0%, whether or not the patient was on-tolvaptan. In CKD 3–5 patients, P 30 s of the MDRD, CKD-EPI, and JSN-CKDI equations were similar. For all four equations, regression coefficients and intercepts did not differ significantly between baseline and on-tolvaptan values, but accuracy of the Cockcroft–Gault formula was inferior to that of the other three equations. Incorporation of serum cystatin C reduced accuracy. Conclusions The CKD-EPI equation is most reliable, regardless of the severity of CKD. Tolvaptain intake has minimal influence and cystatin C incorporation does not improve accuracy.