Incidence of major hemorrhage after aggressive image-guided liver mass biopsy in the era of individualized medicine

Purpose To analyze a large volume of image-guided liver mass biopsies to assess for an increased incidence of major hemorrhage after aggressive liver mass sampling, and to determine if coaxial technique reduces major hemorrhage rate. Methods Patients who underwent image-guided liver mass biopsy over...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Abdominal imaging 2019-06, Vol.44 (6), p.2067-2073
Hauptverfasser: Boyum, James H., Atwell, Thomas D., Wall, Darci J., Mansfield, Aaron S., Kerr, Sarah E., Gunderson, Tina M., Rumilla, Kandelaria M., Weisbrod, Adam J., Kurup, A. Nicholas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To analyze a large volume of image-guided liver mass biopsies to assess for an increased incidence of major hemorrhage after aggressive liver mass sampling, and to determine if coaxial technique reduces major hemorrhage rate. Methods Patients who underwent image-guided liver mass biopsy over a 15-year period (December 7, 2001–September 22, 2016) were retrospectively identified. An aggressive biopsy was defined as a biopsy event in which ≥ 4 core needle passes were performed. Association of major hemorrhage after aggressive liver mass biopsy and other potential risk factors of interest were assessed using logistic regression analysis. For the subset of aggressive biopsies, Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the incidence of major hemorrhage using coaxial versus noncoaxial techniques. Results Aggressive biopsies constituted 11.6% of biopsy events ( N  =579/5011). The incidence of major hemorrhage with
ISSN:2366-004X
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-018-1637-6