A randomized controlled trial evaluating sildenafil citrate in relieving ureteral stent-related symptoms

Purpose To evaluate the role of sildenafil in relieving ureteral stent symptoms. Patients and methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2014 and November 2016. It included adult men who underwent unilateral ureteric stent after ureteroscopy. Patients who were taking PDE5-Is,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2018-11, Vol.36 (11), p.1877-1881
Hauptverfasser: Tharwat, Mohamed, Elsaadany, Mohamed M., Lashin, Ahmed M., EL-Nahas, Ahmed R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the role of sildenafil in relieving ureteral stent symptoms. Patients and methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2014 and November 2016. It included adult men who underwent unilateral ureteric stent after ureteroscopy. Patients who were taking PDE5-Is, alpha-blockers or anticholinergics, had contraindication to sildenafil or developed postoperative complications were not included. Eligible patients were randomized using sealed closed envelops to one of two groups (S and C). Patients in group S received sildenafil citrate 50 mg tablet once daily. Patients in group C were the control. All patients answered the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) after 2 weeks of stenting. Primary outcome was the difference in total USSQ score between both groups. Secondary outcomes were tolerability of the treatment and the difference in each domain of USSQ score. Results After randomization, four patients (7.3%) in group C withdraw their consent because of severe symptoms and two patients (3.6%) in group S discontinued treatment because of headache and dizziness. Final analysis was performed for 46 and 48 patients in groups C and S, respectively. Total USSQ score and all domains (except work performance) were significantly lower in group S ( P  
ISSN:0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2339-y