Treatment of periorbital dark circles: Comparative study of carboxy therapy vs chemical peeling vs mesotherapy

Summary Objective Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of 3 different modalities of treatment for dark circles that function via different modes of action. Methods In total, 45 female patients with periorbital hyperpigmentation were randomly selected to participate from those attendi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2019-02, Vol.18 (1), p.169-175
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed, Naglaa A, Mohammed, Salma S, Fatani, Mohammad I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Objective Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of 3 different modalities of treatment for dark circles that function via different modes of action. Methods In total, 45 female patients with periorbital hyperpigmentation were randomly selected to participate from those attending the outpatient dermatology clinic of Al‐Zahraa University Hospital within a 6‐month period. Patients were divided into 3 groups, and the groups were subjected to different types of therapy: group A, carboxy therapy; group B, chemical peel; and group C, vitamin C mesotherapy. Results No statistically significant differences were detected in improvements in pigmentation or the degree of patient satisfaction between any of the groups. However, the mesotherapy group reported more of a burning sensation following treatment than the other 2 groups but also showed a significant improvement in pigmentation and patient satisfaction compared with the carboxy group. Conclusion All 3 treatment modalities were effective in the reduction in periorbital pigmentation. However, mesotherapy showed a significant improvement in pigmentation and a higher level of patient satisfaction compared with the other types of treatment.
ISSN:1473-2130
1473-2165
DOI:10.1111/jocd.12536