Randomized Comparison of Continuous Versus Intermittent Heparin Infusion During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract Objectives This study tested the hypothesis that continuous heparin infusions would be favorable for maintaining heparin concentrations during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Background Heparin infusions are essential for RFCA of AF. There is a paucity o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Clinical electrophysiology 2016-06, Vol.2 (3), p.319-326
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Tae-Seok, MD, Kim, Sung-Hwan, MD, PhD, Kim, Bo-Kyung, RN, Kim, Ju Youn, MD, Kim, Ji-Hoon, MD, PhD, Jang, Sung-Won, MD, PhD, Lee, Man Young, MD, PhD, Rho, Tai-Ho, MD, PhD, Oh, Yong-Seog, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives This study tested the hypothesis that continuous heparin infusions would be favorable for maintaining heparin concentrations during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Background Heparin infusions are essential for RFCA of AF. There is a paucity of data on the details for the optimal heparin infusion during RFCA of AF. Methods A total of 333 patients undergoing AF ablation were consecutively enrolled and randomized to intermittent or continuous heparin infusion. A heparin bolus of 100 U/kg was injected just prior to transseptal puncture. The heparin concentration necessary to maintain an optimal activated clotting time (ACT) (300 to 400 s) was determined and checked every 30 min during the procedure. The primary endpoint of the study was the frequency of the maintenance of an optimal intraprocedural ACT. Results The frequency of an optimal ACT in the continuous group was significantly higher than that in the intermittent group (64.0% vs. 57.6%, respectively, p < 0.01), whereeas the total heparin level was significantly lower in the continuous group (13,162 ± 4,634 U vs. 15,837 ± 5,243 U, respectively, p < 0.01). The standard deviation of the ACT was significantly smaller in the continuous group than in the intermittent group (49 ± 30 vs. 33 ± 18, respectively, p 
ISSN:2405-500X
2405-5018
DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2015.11.004