Electronic Version of the EQ-5D Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: Adaptation to a Brazilian Population Sample

To assess the measurement equivalence of the original paper version of an adapted tablet version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D). A randomly selected sample of 509 individuals aged 18 to 64 years from the general population responded to the EQ-5D at two time points separated by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health regional issues 2018-12, Vol.17, p.88-93
Hauptverfasser: Bagattini, Ângela Maria, Camey, Suzi Alves, Miguel, Sandro René, Andrade, Mônica Viegas, de Souza Noronha, Kenya Valeria Micaela, de C. Teixeira, Monica Akissue, Lima, Ana Flávia, Santos, Marisa, Polanczyk, Carisi Anne, Cruz, Luciane Nascimento
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the measurement equivalence of the original paper version of an adapted tablet version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D). A randomly selected sample of 509 individuals aged 18 to 64 years from the general population responded to the EQ-5D at two time points separated by a minimum interval of 24 hours and were allocated to one of the following groups: test-retest group (tablet-tablet) or crossover group (paper-tablet and tablet-paper). Agreement between methods was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the κ coefficient. In the crossover group, the following ICC values were obtained: 0.76 (confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.89) for EQ-5D scores and 0.77 (CI 0.68–0.84) for visual analogue scale in subjects responding first to the tablet version; 0.83 (CI 0.75–0.89) for EQ-5D scores and 0.75 (CI 0.67–0.85) for visual analogue scale in subjects responding first to the paper version. In the test-retest group, the ICC was 0.85 (CI 0.73–0.91) for EQ-5D scores and 0.79 (CI 0.66–0.87) for visual analogue scale. The κ values were higher than 0.69 in this group. The internal consistencies of the paper and tablet methods were similar. The paper and tablet versions of the EQ-5D are equivalent. Test-retest and crossover agreement was high and the acceptability of the methods was similar among individuals.
ISSN:2212-1099
2212-1102
DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2017.11.002