Anxiety and depression in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis and comparison of change from baseline after treatment with guselkumab vs. adalimumab: results from the Phase 3 VOYAGE 2 study

Background Anxiety and depression are clinically significant comorbidities associated with psoriasis. Improvements in psoriasis are known to decrease anxiety and depression. Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy and safety for the treatment of moderate‐to‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2018-11, Vol.32 (11), p.1940-1949
Hauptverfasser: Gordon, K.B., Armstrong, A.W., Han, C., Foley, P., Song, M., Wasfi, Y., You, Y., Shen, Y.‐K., Reich, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Anxiety and depression are clinically significant comorbidities associated with psoriasis. Improvements in psoriasis are known to decrease anxiety and depression. Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy and safety for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Objective Assess improvements in anxiety and depression with guselkumab vs. placebo and adalimumab using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Methods In VOYAGE 2, a Phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐ and adalimumab‐controlled study, patients received placebo (through week 16 followed by crossover to guselkumab), guselkumab, or adalimumab through week 24. HADS consists of two subscales measuring anxiety (HADS‐A) and depression (HADS‐D), with scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Scores ≥8 indicate instrument‐defined anxiety or depression. Severity of psoriasis was assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Results Among 989 patients randomized (with baseline HADS measurements), mean HADS‐A and HADS‐D scores were 6.8 ± 4.2 and 5.3 ± 4.2, respectively; 38.6% of patients reported HADS‐A ≥8 and 27.7% HADS‐D ≥8 at baseline. At week 16, a significantly greater proportion of guselkumab patients with baseline HADS‐A or HADS‐D ≥8 reported HADS‐A
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.15012