Systematic literature review on effectiveness of self‐management support interventions in patients with chronic conditions and low socio‐economic status

Aim To assess the quality of evidence and determine the effect of patient‐related and economic outcomes of self‐management support interventions in chronically ill patients with a low socio‐economic status. Background Integrated evidence on self‐management support interventions in chronically ill pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advanced nursing 2017-04, Vol.73 (4), p.775-793
Hauptverfasser: Van Hecke, Ann, Heinen, Maud, Fernández‐Ortega, Paz, Graue, Marit, Hendriks, Jeroen M.L., Høy, Bente, Köpke, Sascha, Lithner, Maria, Van Gaal, Betsie G.I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To assess the quality of evidence and determine the effect of patient‐related and economic outcomes of self‐management support interventions in chronically ill patients with a low socio‐economic status. Background Integrated evidence on self‐management support interventions in chronically ill people with low socio‐economic status is lacking. Design Systematic literature review. Data sources Cochrane database of trials, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Joanna Briggs Institute Library were searched (2000–2013). Randomized controlled trials addressing self‐management support interventions for patients with cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes and/or chronic respiratory disease were included. Review methods Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by independent researchers using a data extraction form. Results Studies (n = 27) focused mainly on diabetes. Fourteen studies cited an underlying theoretical basis. Most frequently used self‐management support components were lifestyle advice, information provision and symptom management. Problem‐solving and goal‐setting strategies were frequently integrated. Eleven studies adapted interventions to the needs of patients with a low socio‐economic status. No differences were found for interventions developed based on health behaviour theoretical models. Conclusion Limited evidence was found for self‐management support interventions in chronically ill patients with low socio‐economic status. Essential characteristics and component(s) of effective self‐management support interventions for these patients could not be detected. Rigorous reporting on development and underlying theories in the intervention is recommended.
ISSN:0309-2402
1365-2648
DOI:10.1111/jan.13159