Oral ibandronate is as active as intravenous zoledronic acid for reducing bone turnover markers in women with breast cancer and bone metastases
Background: Phase III study comparing the effect of oral ibandronate and intravenous zoledronic acid on bone markers. Patients and methods: Breast cancer patients with bone metastases received ibandronate 50 mg/day (n = 137) or zoledronic acid 4 mg every 4 weeks (n = 138) for 12 weeks. The primary e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of oncology 2007-07, Vol.18 (7), p.1165-1171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Phase III study comparing the effect of oral ibandronate and intravenous zoledronic acid on bone markers. Patients and methods: Breast cancer patients with bone metastases received ibandronate 50 mg/day (n = 137) or zoledronic acid 4 mg every 4 weeks (n = 138) for 12 weeks. The primary end point was mean percentage change in serum levels of cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (S-CTX) at week 12. Urinary CTX (U-CTX), bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP), amino-terminal procollagen propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) and osteocalcin (OC) were also measured and bone pain and safety assessed. Results: Both bisphosphonates significantly reduced S-CTX (mean ibandronate 76% ± 29 (SD) versus mean zoledronic acid 73% ± 47; P < 0.001 for both versus baseline) and U-CTX (ibandronate 78% ± 50 versus zoledronic acid 86% ± 17; P < 0.001). The difference in S-CTX between treatments was 0.6% (confidence interval −1.7% to 3.0%), which was within the prespecified noninferiority margin. Bone ALP, PINP and OC decreased by 26%–47% compared with baseline with both bisphosphonates. Compared with zoledronic acid, ibandronate patients reported fewer adverse events overall (65.0% versus 75.9%), and on days 1–3 (8.0% versus 47.5%), including less pyrexia (overall incidence 0% versus 16.8%) and bone pain (5.8% versus 12.4%). Conclusions: Oral ibandronate was well tolerated and statistically noninferior to zoledronic acid for percentage change in the bone resorption marker, S-CTX. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1093/annonc/mdm119 |