Evaluation of small‐group education on the shade determination ability of preclinical dental students—A controlled clinical trial

Objectives To evaluate the effect of small‐group education including practical training on dental students’ shade determination performance compared with a control group. Methods Sixty‐three non‐colour‐blind preclinical students were asked to participate and belonged to an intervention (n = 31) and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of dental education 2018-08, Vol.22 (3), p.e582-e587
Hauptverfasser: Corcodel, N., Krisam, J., Klotz, A.‐L., Deisenhofer, U. K., Stober, T., Hassel, A. J., Rammelsberg, P., Zenthöfer, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the effect of small‐group education including practical training on dental students’ shade determination performance compared with a control group. Methods Sixty‐three non‐colour‐blind preclinical students were asked to participate and belonged to an intervention (n = 31) and a control (n = 32) group, respectively. All students received a lecture on dental shade determination. The members of the intervention group were educated and practically trained in small groups in addition. Ten volunteers, each with unrestored upper right middle and lateral incisors, were recruited. The students of both the intervention and control groups were then asked to determine the colour of the volunteers’ test teeth using the 3D‐Master shade guide (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) under artificial daylight illumination. For analytical purposes, the CIE L*a*b* coordinates were obtained using a spectrophotometer. Colour differences, ΔE, between all shade tabs selected by the students and the natural teeth were calculated. ΔE observed in the intervention and control groups were compared using t tests. In addition, a multi‐level regression model was adjusted for age and gender. Results Mean (SD) ΔE between the shade tabs selected by the students and the natural teeth in the intervention and control groups were 3.8 (2.1) and 4.3 (2.3), respectively (P 
ISSN:1396-5883
1600-0579
DOI:10.1111/eje.12355