Evaluating Changes in Handgrip Strength in Children With Cystic Fibrosis: A Pilot Study

Background Body mass index (BMI) is used to determine nutrition status in children with cystic fibrosis (CF); however, lean body mass (LBM) is more strongly associated with pulmonary function. Handgrip strength (HGS) measures muscle function and is reflective of LBM. The aims of this study were to a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrition in clinical practice 2018-04, Vol.33 (2), p.261-267
Hauptverfasser: Gibson, Hannah T., McDonald, Catherine M., Derrick, Jennifer Willahan, Eggett, Dennis L., Bellini, Sarah Gunnell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Body mass index (BMI) is used to determine nutrition status in children with cystic fibrosis (CF); however, lean body mass (LBM) is more strongly associated with pulmonary function. Handgrip strength (HGS) measures muscle function and is reflective of LBM. The aims of this study were to assess relationships among HGS, nutrition status, and pulmonary function; changes in HGS posthospitalization; and any relationship between HGS and nutrient intake. Methods Twenty‐three children with CF aged 6–18 years participated. BMI z scores, nutrition risk scores, and pulmonary function were assessed about 5 months before, days 5–7 of hospitalization, and about 6 weeks posthospitalization. HGS z scores and arm anthropometrics were measured during and after hospitalization. Nutrient intakes were assessed during hospitalization. Results Mean HGS z score at hospitalization was −1.95 ± 0.92 and posthospitalization was −1.59 ± 1.06 (P = .007). Mean BMI z score prehospitalization was −0.17 ± 0.63, at hospitalization was −0.09 ± 0.64, and posthospitalization was 0.06 ± 0.54 (P = .065). Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) prehospitalization was 93.52 ± 17.35, at hospitalization was 85.65 ± 21.57, and posthospitalization was 95.63 ± 18.18 (P = .001). No significant relationship was found between HGS z scores and BMI z scores (P = .892) or HGS z scores and FEV1 (P = .340). Conclusions HGS z scores and FEV1 significantly increased at follow‐up. HGS z scores were lower than the standard even though mean BMI z scores classified participants as normal nutrition status.
ISSN:0884-5336
1941-2452
DOI:10.1002/ncp.10067