Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified–warmed blastocysts

A retrospective cohort study of 8736 autologous single vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer cycles was conducted in a single centre to investigate the effect of cryostorage on clinical and neonatal outcomes. Cryostorage duration was classified into three groups: (A) 0–2 months (n = 4702); (B) 2–13 m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproductive biomedicine online 2018-06, Vol.36 (6), p.614-619
Hauptverfasser: Ueno, Satoshi, Uchiyama, Kazuo, Kuroda, Tomoko, Yabuuchi, Akiko, Ezoe, Kenji, Okimura, Tadashi, Okuno, Takashi, Kobayashi, Tamotsu, Kato, Keiichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A retrospective cohort study of 8736 autologous single vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer cycles was conducted in a single centre to investigate the effect of cryostorage on clinical and neonatal outcomes. Cryostorage duration was classified into three groups: (A) 0–2 months (n = 4702); (B) 2–13 months (n = 2853) and (C) 13–97 months (n = 1181). Blastocysts were vitrified using the Cryotop method. No significant differences were observed in live birth rates: (A) 37.3%; (B) 34.9%; (C) (35.2%). Gestational period was significantly shorter in group C: (A) 38.7 ± 1.8; (B) 38.6 ± 1.6; (C) 38.1 ± 1.7; P < 0.05. This was clinically unimportant as the average gestational age was more than 38 weeks. No significant differences between groups were observed in birth weight: (A) 3060 ± 455 g; (B) 3052 ± 449 g; (C) 2992 ± 445 g, or congenital malformation rates: (A) 2.2%; (B) 1.9%; (C) 1.8%. The limitation of this study was that maximum storage duration was 8 years; most blastocysts were in cryostorage for much shorter periods. Long-term storage of blastocysts that are vitrified using an open device vitrification system has no negative effect on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
ISSN:1472-6483
1472-6491
DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.008