Disparities in genetics assessment for women with ovarian cancer: Can we do better?
We sought to characterize referral patterns for genetic counseling for women with ovarian cancer and hypothesized that differences in referral and testing rates are shaped by socioeconomic factors. Patients were identified by pathology reports from August 2012 to January 2016 containing the words “s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 2018-04, Vol.149 (1), p.84-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We sought to characterize referral patterns for genetic counseling for women with ovarian cancer and hypothesized that differences in referral and testing rates are shaped by socioeconomic factors.
Patients were identified by pathology reports from August 2012 to January 2016 containing the words “serous” or “ovarian.” Patient information was obtained via electronic medical record. Primary outcomes were placement of a genetics referral and completion of counseling. A secondary outcome was completion of genetic testing.
We identified 246 women with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ten were previously counseled and excluded. 53% of patients were referred for counseling with mean time from diagnosis to counseling of 4.6months. Age and family history were not associated with referral, however rates differed by race with 61% of Caucasian and 40%, 38% and 33% of Asian, Latina and Black women, respectively, referred (p=0.035). Overall, 36% of patients diagnosed underwent counseling, and 33% were tested. English language (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-8258 1095-6859 1095-6859 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.034 |