Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial
Aim The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing. Materials and Methods In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in pos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.522-529 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 529 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 522 |
container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Jung, Ronald E. Sapata, Vitor M. Hämmerle, Christoph H. F. Wu, Hui Hu, Xiu‐lian Lin, Ye |
description | Aim
The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing.
Materials and Methods
In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.
Results
The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%).
Conclusions
The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.13149 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2020877594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047375939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-787a51868300cedeec9f94f5e37f28f342826b75285d9d5cfaa564c7bd1749133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1ERZfCgRdAlrjAIa0dx7HNrVrxT1qpEoJz5DiT4sqxFzvZdnmlviSzbOkBCV_Gkr_5xqMfIa84O-d4LlzI51zwxjwhK94yVjHJ-FOyYobJSvGWn5LnpdwwxlqjzTNyWpuWKSnFityv09T7CANdCtA00juI6RoieEf7FIGWpS-zn5cZ6GRnyN4G6tIOMrbc-vkHtTTa2e-A9j7YPWR8DcGigk4w9dmiY0yZ2rCDFGym2Q_XQLcZCuQddqb4nl5S5IY0-V9odSnOGR2Ha_DRO5w4H-a-ICejDQVePtQz8v3jh2_rz9Xm6tOX9eWmckJrUymtrOS61YIxBwOAM6NpRglCjbUeRVPruu2VrLUczCDdaK1sG6f6gavGcCHOyNujd5vTzwXK3E2-OMCtIqSldDWrmVZKmgbRN_-gN2nJEX-HVKMEQsIg9e5IuZxKyTB22-wnm_cdZ90hwQ4T7P4kiOzrB-PSTzA8kn8jQ-DiCNz6APv_m7r15utR-RtWsKhG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047375939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Jung, Ronald E. ; Sapata, Vitor M. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F. ; Wu, Hui ; Hu, Xiu‐lian ; Lin, Ye</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ronald E. ; Sapata, Vitor M. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F. ; Wu, Hui ; Hu, Xiu‐lian ; Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing.
Materials and Methods
In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.
Results
The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%).
Conclusions
The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.13149</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29607553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Process - pathology ; Alveolar Process - surgery ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods ; Biomedical materials ; Bone loss ; bone regeneration ; bone substitute ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Clinical trials ; Collagen ; Collagen - therapeutic use ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; Dimensional changes ; Healing ; Humans ; Jaw ; Mandible ; Materials substitution ; Maxilla ; Membranes ; Preservation ; Radiography, Dental ; Randomization ; Rank tests ; ridge preservation ; Sockets ; Statistical analysis ; Substitute bone ; Surgical implants ; Teeth ; Tooth Extraction - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.522-529</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-787a51868300cedeec9f94f5e37f28f342826b75285d9d5cfaa564c7bd1749133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-787a51868300cedeec9f94f5e37f28f342826b75285d9d5cfaa564c7bd1749133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2055-1320</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.13149$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.13149$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapata, Vitor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiu‐lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><title>Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Aim
The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing.
Materials and Methods
In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.
Results
The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%).
Conclusions
The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions.</description><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - pathology</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - surgery</subject><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone loss</subject><subject>bone regeneration</subject><subject>bone substitute</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Collagen - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dimensional changes</subject><subject>Healing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Materials substitution</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Rank tests</subject><subject>ridge preservation</subject><subject>Sockets</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction - adverse effects</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1ERZfCgRdAlrjAIa0dx7HNrVrxT1qpEoJz5DiT4sqxFzvZdnmlviSzbOkBCV_Gkr_5xqMfIa84O-d4LlzI51zwxjwhK94yVjHJ-FOyYobJSvGWn5LnpdwwxlqjzTNyWpuWKSnFityv09T7CANdCtA00juI6RoieEf7FIGWpS-zn5cZ6GRnyN4G6tIOMrbc-vkHtTTa2e-A9j7YPWR8DcGigk4w9dmiY0yZ2rCDFGym2Q_XQLcZCuQddqb4nl5S5IY0-V9odSnOGR2Ha_DRO5w4H-a-ICejDQVePtQz8v3jh2_rz9Xm6tOX9eWmckJrUymtrOS61YIxBwOAM6NpRglCjbUeRVPruu2VrLUczCDdaK1sG6f6gavGcCHOyNujd5vTzwXK3E2-OMCtIqSldDWrmVZKmgbRN_-gN2nJEX-HVKMEQsIg9e5IuZxKyTB22-wnm_cdZ90hwQ4T7P4kiOzrB-PSTzA8kn8jQ-DiCNz6APv_m7r15utR-RtWsKhG</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Jung, Ronald E.</creator><creator>Sapata, Vitor M.</creator><creator>Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.</creator><creator>Wu, Hui</creator><creator>Hu, Xiu‐lian</creator><creator>Lin, Ye</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-1320</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><author>Jung, Ronald E. ; Sapata, Vitor M. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F. ; Wu, Hui ; Hu, Xiu‐lian ; Lin, Ye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-787a51868300cedeec9f94f5e37f28f342826b75285d9d5cfaa564c7bd1749133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - pathology</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - surgery</topic><topic>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone loss</topic><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>bone substitute</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Collagen - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dimensional changes</topic><topic>Healing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Materials substitution</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Rank tests</topic><topic>ridge preservation</topic><topic>Sockets</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapata, Vitor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiu‐lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Ronald E.</au><au>Sapata, Vitor M.</au><au>Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.</au><au>Wu, Hui</au><au>Hu, Xiu‐lian</au><au>Lin, Ye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>522-529</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Aim
The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing.
Materials and Methods
In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.
Results
The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%).
Conclusions
The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29607553</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.13149</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-1320</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.522-529 |
issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2020877594 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging Alveolar Process - pathology Alveolar Process - surgery Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods Biomedical materials Bone loss bone regeneration bone substitute Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use Bone Transplantation - methods Clinical trials Collagen Collagen - therapeutic use Computed tomography Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dentistry Dimensional changes Healing Humans Jaw Mandible Materials substitution Maxilla Membranes Preservation Radiography, Dental Randomization Rank tests ridge preservation Sockets Statistical analysis Substitute bone Surgical implants Teeth Tooth Extraction - adverse effects |
title | Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A38%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20use%20of%20xenogeneic%20bone%20substitute%20material%20covered%20with%20a%20native%20bilayer%20collagen%20membrane%20for%20alveolar%20ridge%20preservation:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Jung,%20Ronald%20E.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=522-529&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.13149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2047375939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047375939&rft_id=info:pmid/29607553&rfr_iscdi=true |