Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Aim The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing. Materials and Methods In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in pos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.522-529
Hauptverfasser: Jung, Ronald E., Sapata, Vitor M., Hämmerle, Christoph H. F., Wu, Hui, Hu, Xiu‐lian, Lin, Ye
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 529
container_issue 5
container_start_page 522
container_title Clinical oral implants research
container_volume 29
creator Jung, Ronald E.
Sapata, Vitor M.
Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.
Wu, Hui
Hu, Xiu‐lian
Lin, Ye
description Aim The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing. Materials and Methods In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%). Conclusions The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.13149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2020877594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047375939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-787a51868300cedeec9f94f5e37f28f342826b75285d9d5cfaa564c7bd1749133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1ERZfCgRdAlrjAIa0dx7HNrVrxT1qpEoJz5DiT4sqxFzvZdnmlviSzbOkBCV_Gkr_5xqMfIa84O-d4LlzI51zwxjwhK94yVjHJ-FOyYobJSvGWn5LnpdwwxlqjzTNyWpuWKSnFityv09T7CANdCtA00juI6RoieEf7FIGWpS-zn5cZ6GRnyN4G6tIOMrbc-vkHtTTa2e-A9j7YPWR8DcGigk4w9dmiY0yZ2rCDFGym2Q_XQLcZCuQddqb4nl5S5IY0-V9odSnOGR2Ha_DRO5w4H-a-ICejDQVePtQz8v3jh2_rz9Xm6tOX9eWmckJrUymtrOS61YIxBwOAM6NpRglCjbUeRVPruu2VrLUczCDdaK1sG6f6gavGcCHOyNujd5vTzwXK3E2-OMCtIqSldDWrmVZKmgbRN_-gN2nJEX-HVKMEQsIg9e5IuZxKyTB22-wnm_cdZ90hwQ4T7P4kiOzrB-PSTzA8kn8jQ-DiCNz6APv_m7r15utR-RtWsKhG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047375939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Jung, Ronald E. ; Sapata, Vitor M. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F. ; Wu, Hui ; Hu, Xiu‐lian ; Lin, Ye</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ronald E. ; Sapata, Vitor M. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F. ; Wu, Hui ; Hu, Xiu‐lian ; Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing. Materials and Methods In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%). Conclusions The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.13149</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29607553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Process - pathology ; Alveolar Process - surgery ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods ; Biomedical materials ; Bone loss ; bone regeneration ; bone substitute ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Clinical trials ; Collagen ; Collagen - therapeutic use ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; Dimensional changes ; Healing ; Humans ; Jaw ; Mandible ; Materials substitution ; Maxilla ; Membranes ; Preservation ; Radiography, Dental ; Randomization ; Rank tests ; ridge preservation ; Sockets ; Statistical analysis ; Substitute bone ; Surgical implants ; Teeth ; Tooth Extraction - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.522-529</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-787a51868300cedeec9f94f5e37f28f342826b75285d9d5cfaa564c7bd1749133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-787a51868300cedeec9f94f5e37f28f342826b75285d9d5cfaa564c7bd1749133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2055-1320</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.13149$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.13149$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29607553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapata, Vitor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiu‐lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><title>Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Aim The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing. Materials and Methods In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%). Conclusions The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions.</description><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - pathology</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - surgery</subject><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone loss</subject><subject>bone regeneration</subject><subject>bone substitute</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Collagen - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dimensional changes</subject><subject>Healing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Materials substitution</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Rank tests</subject><subject>ridge preservation</subject><subject>Sockets</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction - adverse effects</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1ERZfCgRdAlrjAIa0dx7HNrVrxT1qpEoJz5DiT4sqxFzvZdnmlviSzbOkBCV_Gkr_5xqMfIa84O-d4LlzI51zwxjwhK94yVjHJ-FOyYobJSvGWn5LnpdwwxlqjzTNyWpuWKSnFityv09T7CANdCtA00juI6RoieEf7FIGWpS-zn5cZ6GRnyN4G6tIOMrbc-vkHtTTa2e-A9j7YPWR8DcGigk4w9dmiY0yZ2rCDFGym2Q_XQLcZCuQddqb4nl5S5IY0-V9odSnOGR2Ha_DRO5w4H-a-ICejDQVePtQz8v3jh2_rz9Xm6tOX9eWmckJrUymtrOS61YIxBwOAM6NpRglCjbUeRVPruu2VrLUczCDdaK1sG6f6gavGcCHOyNujd5vTzwXK3E2-OMCtIqSldDWrmVZKmgbRN_-gN2nJEX-HVKMEQsIg9e5IuZxKyTB22-wnm_cdZ90hwQ4T7P4kiOzrB-PSTzA8kn8jQ-DiCNz6APv_m7r15utR-RtWsKhG</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Jung, Ronald E.</creator><creator>Sapata, Vitor M.</creator><creator>Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.</creator><creator>Wu, Hui</creator><creator>Hu, Xiu‐lian</creator><creator>Lin, Ye</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-1320</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><author>Jung, Ronald E. ; Sapata, Vitor M. ; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F. ; Wu, Hui ; Hu, Xiu‐lian ; Lin, Ye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-787a51868300cedeec9f94f5e37f28f342826b75285d9d5cfaa564c7bd1749133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - pathology</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - surgery</topic><topic>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone loss</topic><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>bone substitute</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Collagen - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dimensional changes</topic><topic>Healing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Materials substitution</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Rank tests</topic><topic>ridge preservation</topic><topic>Sockets</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapata, Vitor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiu‐lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ye</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Ronald E.</au><au>Sapata, Vitor M.</au><au>Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.</au><au>Wu, Hui</au><au>Hu, Xiu‐lian</au><au>Lin, Ye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>522-529</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Aim The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing. Materials and Methods In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%). Conclusions The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29607553</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.13149</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-1320</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7161
ispartof Clinical oral implants research, 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.522-529
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2020877594
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging
Alveolar Process - pathology
Alveolar Process - surgery
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods
Biomedical materials
Bone loss
bone regeneration
bone substitute
Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use
Bone Transplantation - methods
Clinical trials
Collagen
Collagen - therapeutic use
Computed tomography
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dentistry
Dimensional changes
Healing
Humans
Jaw
Mandible
Materials substitution
Maxilla
Membranes
Preservation
Radiography, Dental
Randomization
Rank tests
ridge preservation
Sockets
Statistical analysis
Substitute bone
Surgical implants
Teeth
Tooth Extraction - adverse effects
title Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A38%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20use%20of%20xenogeneic%20bone%20substitute%20material%20covered%20with%20a%20native%20bilayer%20collagen%20membrane%20for%20alveolar%20ridge%20preservation:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Jung,%20Ronald%20E.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=522-529&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.13149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2047375939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047375939&rft_id=info:pmid/29607553&rfr_iscdi=true