Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial
Aim The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing. Materials and Methods In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in pos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2018-05, Vol.29 (5), p.522-529 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim
The aim of this split‐mouth randomized controlled study was to evaluate radiographic dimensional changes after tooth extraction in posterior sites treated with a ridge preservation technique or left for spontaneous healing.
Materials and Methods
In a total of 18 patients, tooth extraction in posterior sites of the upper and lower jaw was performed in a split‐mouth design. The post‐extraction sockets were randomly assigned to the following two treatment modalities: deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group) and spontaneous healing (control group). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed after extractions, 3 and 6 months later. The following parameters were measured: the height of the buccal bone plate (BH), height of the palatal bone plate (PH), horizontal width of the extraction socket at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (HW‐1, HW‐3, HW‐5), and the horizontal width (thickness) of the buccal bone plate at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm (BHP‐1, BHP‐3, BHP‐5). Statistical analysis was performed applying a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.
Results
The CBCT analysis showed a bone loss compared to baseline in test and control group. The measurements which have reached statistically significant differences at 6 months were BH (test: −2.31% vs control: −13.11%), PH (test: −2.07% vs control: −15.32%), HW‐1 (test: −17.14% vs control: −32.47%), and HW‐3 (test: −11.65% vs control: −28.47%).
Conclusions
The posterior ridge preservation technique using DBBM‐C covered with a NBCM is a valid approach reducing the amount of the radiographic loss in alveolar ridge dimensions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
DOI: | 10.1111/clr.13149 |